BACKGROUND: Systematic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation is recommended for detection of chronic kidney disease and prediction of cardiovascular (CV) risk. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is a newly developed and validated formula for eGFR that is more accurate at normal or near-normal eGFR. We aimed to assess the incremental prognostic accuracy of eGFR(CKD-EPI) versus eGFR(MDRD) in subjects at increased risk for CV disease. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the VALIANT trial that enrolled 14,527 patients with acute myocardial infarction with signs and symptoms of heart failure and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The eGFR(MDRD) and eGFR(CKD-EPI) were computed using age, gender, race, and baseline creatinine level. Patients were categorized according to their eGFR using each equation. To assess the incremental prognostic value of eGFR(CKD-EPI), the net reclassification improvement was calculated for the composite end point of CV death, recurrent myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of the subjects were reclassified into a different eGFR category using eGFR(CKD-EPI). The composite end point occurred in 33% of the subjects in this cohort. Based on eGFR(CKD-EPI), subjects reclassified into a higher eGFR experienced fewer events than those reclassified into a lower eGFR (21% vs 43%). In unadjusted analyses, the composite end point risk in subjects with eGFR between 75 and 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) was comparable with the referent group (eGFR between 90 and 105) using eGFR(MDRD) (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.2) but was significantly higher using eGFR(CKD-EPI) (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4). The net reclassification improvement for eGFR(CKD-EPI) over eGFR(MDRD) was 8.7%. CONCLUSION: The CKD-EPI equation provides more accurate risk stratification than the MDRD Study equation in patients at high risk for CV disease, including identification of increased risk at mildly decreased eGFR.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Systematic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation is recommended for detection of chronic kidney disease and prediction of cardiovascular (CV) risk. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is a newly developed and validated formula for eGFR that is more accurate at normal or near-normal eGFR. We aimed to assess the incremental prognostic accuracy of eGFR(CKD-EPI) versus eGFR(MDRD) in subjects at increased risk for CV disease. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the VALIANT trial that enrolled 14,527 patients with acute myocardial infarction with signs and symptoms of heart failure and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The eGFR(MDRD) and eGFR(CKD-EPI) were computed using age, gender, race, and baseline creatinine level. Patients were categorized according to their eGFR using each equation. To assess the incremental prognostic value of eGFR(CKD-EPI), the net reclassification improvement was calculated for the composite end point of CV death, recurrent myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of the subjects were reclassified into a different eGFR category using eGFR(CKD-EPI). The composite end point occurred in 33% of the subjects in this cohort. Based on eGFR(CKD-EPI), subjects reclassified into a higher eGFR experienced fewer events than those reclassified into a lower eGFR (21% vs 43%). In unadjusted analyses, the composite end point risk in subjects with eGFR between 75 and 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) was comparable with the referent group (eGFR between 90 and 105) using eGFR(MDRD) (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.2) but was significantly higher using eGFR(CKD-EPI) (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4). The net reclassification improvement for eGFR(CKD-EPI) over eGFR(MDRD) was 8.7%. CONCLUSION: The CKD-EPI equation provides more accurate risk stratification than the MDRD Study equation in patients at high risk for CV disease, including identification of increased risk at mildly decreased eGFR.
Authors: Rajesh Mohandas; Mark Segal; Titte R Srinivas; B Delia Johnson; Xuerong Wen; Eileen M Handberg; John W Petersen; George Sopko; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Enayet K Chowdhury; Robyn G Langham; Zanfina Ademi; Alice Owen; Henry Krum; Lindon M H Wing; Mark R Nelson; Christopher M Reid Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Lesley A Inker; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Hocine Tighiouart; Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Ron T Gansevoort; Andrew L Simon; Jian Ying; Gerald J Beck; Christoph Wanner; Jürgen Floege; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Vlado Perkovic; Edward F Vonesh; Tom Greene Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Tadeusz Osadnik; Jarosław Wasilewski; Andrzej Lekston; Joanna Strzelczyk; Anna Kurek; Aleksander Rafał Gutowski; Krzysztof Dyrbuś; Kamil Bujak; Rafał Reguła; Piotr Rozentryt; Bożena Szyguła-Jurkiewicz; Lech Poloński Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-03-09 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Joshua I Barzilay; Barry R Davis; Sara L Pressel; Alokananda Ghosh; Mahboob Rahman; Paula T Einhorn; William C Cushman; Paul K Whelton; Jackson T Wright Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Hyukjin Park; Young Joon Hong; Si Hyun Rhew; Sung Soo Kim; Young Wook Jeong; Hae Chang Jeong; Jae Yeong Cho; Soo Young Jang; Ki Hong Lee; Keun Ho Park; Doo Sun Sim; Nam Sik Yoon; Hyun Ju Yoon; Kye Hun Kim; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Myung Ho Jeong; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 2.884
Authors: Nawar M Shara; Hong Wang; Mihriye Mete; Yaman Rai Al-Balha; Nameer Azalddin; Elisa T Lee; Nora Franceschini; Stacey E Jolly; Barbara V Howard; Jason G Umans Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 8.860