Literature DB >> 21884747

Effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccines against laboratory-confirmed H1N1 infections: population-based case-control study.

Salaheddin Mahmud1, Gregory Hammond, Lawrence Elliott, Tim Hilderman, Carol Kurbis, Patricia Caetano, Paul Van Caeseele, Joel Kettner, Magdy Dawood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excellent immune responses following 1 or 2 doses of the monovalent inactivated pandemic H1N1 vaccines have been documented, but the effectiveness of these vaccines against laboratory-confirmed H1N1 infections in the general population is not clear. We evaluated the effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 and seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV) used during the 2009 mass vaccination campaign in Manitoba (Canada) in preventing laboratory-confirmed H1N1 infections.
METHODS: A population-based case-control study using data from Cadham Provincial Laboratory (CPL) and the Manitoba Immunization Monitoring System (MIMS). All Manitoba residents ≥6 months of age who had a respiratory specimen tested at CPL for H1N1 were included in the study. Cases were individuals who tested positive for pandemic H1N1 influenza A by reverse transcriptase-PCR (N=1435). Controls were individuals who tested negative for both influenza A and B (N=2309). Information on receipt of TIV or H1N1 vaccine was obtained by record linkage with MIMS, the population-based province-wide immunization registry.
RESULTS: Overall, the adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine was 86% (95%CI 75-93%) effective in preventing laboratory-confirmed H1N1 infections when vaccination occurred ≥14 days before testing. Effectiveness seemed lower among older (≥50 years) individuals [51% (-51 to 84%)] and among those with immunocompromising conditions [67% (-13 to 90%)]. There was also evidence that the H1N1 vaccine might be less effective among those who had received the 2009/10 TIV. DISCUSSION: The adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine used during Manitoba's H1N1 mass vaccination campaign was highly effective against laboratory-confirmed pandemic H1N1 infection, especially among children and younger adults.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21884747     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  20 in total

1.  Effectiveness of an Indian-made attenuated influenza A(H1N1)pdm 2009 vaccine: a case control study.

Authors:  Prasad S Kulkarni; Sharad Agarkhedkar; Sanjay Lalwani; Ashish R Bavdekar; Sameer Jog; Sidram K Raut; Varsha Parulekar; Shalaka S Agarkhedkar; Sonali Palkar; Somnath Mangrule
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Potential of the test-negative design for measuring influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sheena G Sullivan; Shuo Feng; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.217

3.  The Use of Test-negative Controls to Monitor Vaccine Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of Methodology.

Authors:  Huiying Chua; Shuo Feng; Joseph A Lewnard; Sheena G Sullivan; Christopher C Blyth; Marc Lipsitch; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 4.  Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Alessandro Rivetti; Carlo Di Pietrantonj; Vittorio Demicheli; Eliana Ferroni
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

Review 5.  Effectiveness and harms of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines in children, adults and elderly: a critical review and re-analysis of 15 meta-analyses.

Authors:  Lamberto Manzoli; John P A Ioannidis; Maria Elena Flacco; Corrado De Vito; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Comparison of the epidemiology of laboratory-confirmed influenza A and influenza B cases in Manitoba, Canada.

Authors:  Aynslie M Hinds; Songul Bozat-Emre; Paul Van Caeseele; Salaheddin M Mahmud
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Estimating the influenza vaccine effectiveness against medically attended influenza in clinical settings: a hospital-based case-control study with a rapid diagnostic test in Japan.

Authors:  Motoi Suzuki; Hiroyuki Yoshimine; Yoshitaka Harada; Naho Tsuchiya; Ikumi Shimada; Koya Ariyoshi; Kenichiro Inoue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Alessandro Rivetti; Carlo Di Pietrantonj; Vittorio Demicheli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-01

9.  Neonatal outcomes after antenatal influenza immunization during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: impact on preterm birth, birth weight, and small for gestational age birth.

Authors:  Jennifer L Richards; Craig Hansen; Christine Bredfeldt; Robert A Bednarczyk; Mark C Steinhoff; Dzifa Adjaye-Gbewonyo; Kevin Ault; Mia Gallagher; Walter Orenstein; Robert L Davis; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Did the H1N1 Vaccine Reduce the Risk of Admission with Influenza and Pneumonia during the Pandemic?

Authors:  Salaheddin M Mahmud; Songul Bozat-Emre; Gregory Hammond; Lawrence Elliott; Paul Van Caeseele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.