BACKGROUND: Reading disability (RD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are comorbid and genetically correlated, especially the inattentive dimension of ADHD (ADHD-I). However, previous research indicates that RD and ADHD enter into opposite gene by environment (G × E) interactions. METHODS: This study used behavioral genetic methods to replicate these opposite G × E interactions in a sample of same-sex monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs from the Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center (CLDRC; DeFries et al., 1997) and to test a genetic hypothesis for why these opposite interactions occur. RESULTS: We replicated opposite G × E interactions for RD (bioecological) and ADHD-I (diathesis-stress) with parental education in the same sample of participants. The genetic hypothesis for this opposite pattern of interactions is that only genes specific to each disorder enter into these opposite interactions, not the shared genes underlying their comorbidity. To test this hypothesis, we used single models with an exploratory three-way interaction, in which the G × E interactions for each disorder were moderated by comorbidity. Neither three-way interaction was significant. The heritability of RD did not vary as a function of parental education and ADHD-I. Similarly, the heritability of ADHD-I did not vary as a function of parental education and RD. CONCLUSIONS: We documented opposite G × E interactions in RD and ADHD-I in the same overall twin sample, but the explanation for this apparent paradox remains unclear. Examining specific genes and more specific environmental factors may help resolve the paradox.
BACKGROUND: Reading disability (RD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are comorbid and genetically correlated, especially the inattentive dimension of ADHD (ADHD-I). However, previous research indicates that RD and ADHD enter into opposite gene by environment (G × E) interactions. METHODS: This study used behavioral genetic methods to replicate these opposite G × E interactions in a sample of same-sex monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs from the Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center (CLDRC; DeFries et al., 1997) and to test a genetic hypothesis for why these opposite interactions occur. RESULTS: We replicated opposite G × E interactions for RD (bioecological) and ADHD-I (diathesis-stress) with parental education in the same sample of participants. The genetic hypothesis for this opposite pattern of interactions is that only genes specific to each disorder enter into these opposite interactions, not the shared genes underlying their comorbidity. To test this hypothesis, we used single models with an exploratory three-way interaction, in which the G × E interactions for each disorder were moderated by comorbidity. Neither three-way interaction was significant. The heritability of RD did not vary as a function of parental education and ADHD-I. Similarly, the heritability of ADHD-I did not vary as a function of parental education and RD. CONCLUSIONS: We documented opposite G × E interactions in RD and ADHD-I in the same overall twin sample, but the explanation for this apparent paradox remains unclear. Examining specific genes and more specific environmental factors may help resolve the paradox.
Authors: J Lasky-Su; Stephen V Faraone; C Lange; M T Tsuang; A E Doyle; J W Smoller; N M Laird; J Biederman Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2007-01-10 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Avshalom Caspi; Joseph McClay; Terrie E Moffitt; Jonathan Mill; Judy Martin; Ian W Craig; Alan Taylor; Richie Poulton Journal: Science Date: 2002-08-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Bruce F Pennington; Lauren M McGrath; Jenni Rosenberg; Holly Barnard; Shelley D Smith; Erik G Willcutt; Angela Friend; John C Defries; Richard K Olson Journal: Dev Psychol Date: 2009-01
Authors: Mikko Taipale; Nina Kaminen; Jaana Nopola-Hemmi; Tuomas Haltia; Birgitta Myllyluoma; Heikki Lyytinen; Kurt Muller; Minna Kaaranen; Perttu J Lindsberg; Katariina Hannula-Jouppi; Juha Kere Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Miao Li; Dongnhu T Truong; Mellissa DeMille; Jeffrey G Malins; Maureen W Lovett; Joan Bosson-Heenan; Jeffrey R Gruen; Jan C Frijters Journal: Child Neuropsychol Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Sally J Wadsworth; John C DeFries; Erik G Willcutt; Bruce F Pennington; Richard K Olson Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: C Huppertz; M Bartels; E J C de Geus; C E M van Beijsterveldt; R J Rose; J Kaprio; K Silventoinen Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 4.221