Literature DB >> 21883980

A new version of PRT software for sibling groups reconstruction with comments regarding several issues in the sibling reconstruction problem.

Anthony Almudevar1, Eric C Anderson.   

Abstract

Pedigree reconstruction using genotypic markers has become an important tool for the study of natural populations. The nonstandard nature of the underlying statistical problems has led to the necessity of developing specialized statistical and computational methods. In this article, a new version of pedigree reconstruction tools (PRT 2.0) is presented. The software implements algorithms proposed in Almudevar & Field (Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, 4, 1999, 136) and Almudevar (Biometrics, 57, 2001a, 757) for the reconstruction of single generation sibling groups (SG). A wider range of enumeration algorithms is included, permitting improved computational performance. In particular, an iterative version of the algorithm designed for larger samples is included in a fully automated form. The new version also includes expanded simulation utilities, as well as extensive reporting, including half-sibling compatibility, parental genotype estimates and flagging of potential genotype errors. A number of alternative algorithms are described and demonstrated. A comparative discussion of the underlying methodologies is presented. Although important aspects of this problem remain open, we argue that a number of methodologies including maximum likelihood estimation (COLONY 1.2 and 2.0) and the set cover formulation (KINALYZER) exhibit undesirable properties in the sibling reconstruction problem. There is considerable evidence that large sets of individuals not genetically excluded as siblings can be inferred to be a true sibling group, but it is also true that unrelated individuals may be genetically compatible with a true sibling group by chance. Such individuals may be identified on a statistical basis. PRT 2.0, based on these sound statistical principles, is able to efficiently match or exceed the highest reported accuracy rates, particularly for larger SG. The new version is available at http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/biostat/people/faculty/almudevar.cfm.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21883980     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03061.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  6 in total

1.  Joint Estimation of Pedigrees and Effective Population Size Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Amy Ko; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On the choice of prior density for the Bayesian analysis of pedigree structure.

Authors:  Anthony Almudevar; Jason LaCombe
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  An improvement on the maximum likelihood reconstruction of pedigrees from marker data.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data.

Authors:  Veronika Städele; Linda Vigilant
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Composite likelihood method for inferring local pedigrees.

Authors:  Amy Ko; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Fast half-sibling population reconstruction: theory and algorithms.

Authors:  Daniel Dexter; Daniel G Brown
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 1.405

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.