Literature DB >> 21883837

Upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: location is not correlated with prognosis.

Bogomir Milojevic1, Milan Djokic, Sandra Sipetic-Grujicic, Dragica Milenkovic-Petronic, Aleksandar Vuksanovic, Uros Bumbasirevic, Ivan Vukovic, Dejan Dragicevic, Cane Tulic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the impact of tumour location on the disease recurrence and survival of patients who were treated surgically for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (UUT-TCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-centre series of 189 consecutive patients who were treated surgically for UUT-TCC between January 1999 and December 2009 was evaluated. Patients who had previously undergone radical cystectomy, preoperative chemotherapy or contralateral UUT-TCC were excluded. In all, 133 patients were available for evaluation. Tumour location was categorized as renal pelvis or ureter based on the location of the dominant tumour. Recurrence-free probabilities and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses.
RESULTS: The 5-year recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival estimates for the cohort in the present study were 66% and 62%, respectively. The 5-year bladder-only recurrence-free probability was 76%. Using multivariate analysis, only pT classification (hazard ratio, HR, 2.46; P = 0.04) and demographic characteristics (HR, 2.86 for areas of Balkan endemic nephropathy, vs non-Balkan endemic nephropathy areas; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-5.98; P = 0.005) were associated with disease recurrence. Tumour location was not associated with disease recurrence in any of the analyses. There was no difference in cancer-specific survival between renal pelvis and ureteral tumours (P = 0.476). Using multivariate analysis, pT classification (HR, 8.04; P = 0.001) and lymph node status (HR, 4.73; P = 0.01) were the only independent predictors associated with a worse cancer-specific survival.
CONCLUSION: Tumour location is unable to predict outcomes in a single-centre series of consecutive patients who were treated with radical nephroureterectomy for UUT-TCC.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21883837     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10461.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

1.  Molecular profile of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: are pelvicalyceal and ureteral tumors different?

Authors:  Laura-Maria Krabbe; Aditya Bagrodia; Mary E Westerman; Bishoy A Gayed; Ahmed Q Haddad; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat; Payal Kapur; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The impact of tumor size on outcomes in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Dragica Milenkovic-Petronic; Bogomir Milojevic; Milan Djokic; Sandra Sipetic-Grujicic; Isidora Grozdic Milojevic; Uros Bumbasirevic; Zoran Dzamic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Survival differences of patients with ureteral versus pelvicalyceal tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Krystian Kaczmarek; Artur Lemiński; Adam Gołąb; Marcin Słojewski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  The impact of tumor location and multifocality on prognosis for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  YunJian Wu; Qiang Dong; LiangRen Liu; Ping Han; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jae Wook Chung; Jun Nyung Lee; Kyong Min Park; Kyeong Hyeon Byeon; Hyejin Cheon; Yun Sok Ha; Seock Hwan Choi; Bum Soo Kim; Tae Hwan Kim; Eun Sang Yoo; Tae Gyun Kwon; Hyun Tae Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-12-09

6.  The Prognostic Impact of Tumor Location in pT3N0M0 Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tzu Shuang Chen; Yen Ta Chen; Hung Jen Wang; Po Hui Chiang; Wen Chou Yang; Wei Ching Lee; Yao Chi Chuang; Yuan Tso Cheng; Chih Hsiung Kang; Wei Chia Lee; Chien Hsu Chen; Yuan Chi Shen; Yi Yang Liu; Hui Ying Liu; Yin Lun Chang; Yu Li Su; Chun Chieh Huang; Hao Lun Luo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  High expression of KPNA2 defines poor prognosis in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Bentao Shi; Boxing Su; Dong Fang; Yuan Tang; Gengyan Xiong; Zhongqiang Guo; Qun He; Xinyu Yang; Wei Zhao; Yinglu Guo; Xuesong Li; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Effects of tumor size and location on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Shreyas S Joshi; Laura L Quast; Sam S Chang; Sanjay G Patel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 9.  The Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wojciech Krajewski; Łukasz Nowak; Bartosz Małkiewicz; Joanna Chorbińska; Paweł Kiełb; Adrian Poterek; Bartłomiej Sporniak; Michał Sut; Marco Moschini; Chiara Lonati; Roberto Carando; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Keiichiro Mori; Krzysztof Kaliszewski; Tomasz Szydełko
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-12-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.