Literature DB >> 21883659

Resuscitation strategies from bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest.

Jacqueline Mauch1, Olga Martin Jurado, Nelly Spielmann, Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger, Markus Weiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Local anesthetic (LA) intoxication with cardiovascular arrest is a potential fatal complication of regional anesthesia. Lipid resuscitation has been recommended for the treatment of LA-induced cardiac arrest. Aim of the study was to compare four different rescue regimens using epinephrine and/or lipid emulsion and vasopressin to treat cardiac arrest caused by bupivacaine intoxication.
METHODS: Twenty-eight piglets were randomized into four groups (4 × 7), anesthetized with sevoflurane, intubated, and ventilated. Bupivacaine was infused with a syringe driver via central venous catheter at a rate of 1 mg·kg(-1)·min(-1) until circulatory arrest. Bupivacaine infusion and sevoflurane were then stopped, chest compression was started, and the pigs were ventilated with 100% oxygen. After 1 min, epinephrine 10 μg·kg(-1) (group 1), Intralipid(®) 20% 4 ml·kg(-1) (group 2), epinephrine 10 μg·kg(-1) + Intralipid(®) 4 ml·kg(-1) (group 3) or 2 IU vasopressin + Intralipid(®) 4 ml·kg(-1) (group 4) were administered. Secondary epinephrine doses were given after 5 min if required.
RESULTS: Survival was 71%, 29%, 86%, and 57% in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4. Return of spontaneous circulation was regained only by initial administration of epinephrine alone or in combination with Intralipid(®). Piglets receiving the combination therapy survived without further epinephrine support. In contrast, in groups 2 and 4, return of spontaneous circulation was only achieved after secondary epinephrine rescue.
CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac arrest caused by bupivacaine intoxication, first-line rescue with epinephrine and epinephrine + Intralipid(®) was more effective with regard to survival than Intralipid(®) alone and vasopressin + Intralipid(®) in this pig model.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21883659     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03688.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Pediatric caudal anesthesia : importance and aspects of safety concerns].

Authors:  J Mauch; M Weiss
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Pediatric caudal anesthesia: importance and aspects of safety concerns].

Authors:  J Mauch; M Weiss
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Regional anesthesia procedures in childhood: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations on pediatric perioperative pain management].

Authors:  B Messerer; M Platzer; C Justin; M Vittinghoff
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 4.  Arginine vasopressin receptor signaling and functional outcomes in heart failure.

Authors:  Melissa A Wasilewski; Valerie D Myers; Fabio A Recchia; Arthur M Feldman; Douglas G Tilley
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.315

5.  Refractory cardiac arrest due to inadvertent intravenous injection of 0.25% bupivacaine used for local infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  Bhavani S Vijay; Subhro Mitra; Shahin N Jamil
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 Jan-Apr

6.  Cardiac Arrest after Local Anaesthetic Toxicity in a Paediatric Patient.

Authors:  Liana Maria Torres de Araújo Azi; Diego Grimaldi Figueroa; Ana Amélia Souza Simas
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-10-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.