Literature DB >> 21883577

Item response theory: how Mokken scaling can be used in clinical practice.

Roger Watson1, L Andries van der Ark, Li-Chan Lin, Robert Fieo, Ian J Deary, Rob R Meijer.   

Abstract

AIMS: To demonstrate the principles and application of Mokken scaling.
BACKGROUND: The history and development of Mokken scaling is described, some examples of applications are given, and some recent development of the method are summarised.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data obtained by cross-sectional survey methods, including self-report and observation.
METHODS: Data from the Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia scale and the Townsend Functional Ability Scale were analysed using the Mokken scaling procedure within the 'R' statistical package. Specifically, invariant item ordering (the extent to which the order of the items in terms of difficulty was the same for all respondents whatever their total scale score) was studied.
RESULTS: The Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia scale and the Townsend Functional Ability Scale showed no violations of invariant item ordering, although only the Townsend Functional Ability Scale showed a medium accuracy.
CONCLUSION: Mokken scaling is an established method for item response theory analysis with wide application in the social sciences. It provides psychometricians with an additional tool in the development of questionnaires and in the study of individuals and their responses to latent traits. Specifically, with regard to the analyses conducted in this study, the Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia scale requires further development and study across different levels of severity of dementia and feeding difficulty. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Good scales are required for assessment in clinical practice and the present paper shows how a relatively recently developed method for analysing Mokken scales can contribute to this. The two scales used as examples for analysis are highly clinically relevant.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21883577     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03893.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  40 in total

1.  Mokken scaling of the Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey.

Authors:  David R Thompson; Chantal F Ski; Roger Watson; Wenru Wang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Modeling the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II using non-parametric item response models.

Authors:  Francisca Galindo-Garre; María Dolores Hidalgo; Georgina Guilera; Oscar Pino; J Emilio Rojo; Juana Gómez-Benito
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Validation of a Chinese version of the Frenchay Activities Index in patients with traumatic limb injury.

Authors:  Jen-Suh Chern; Mei-Hsiang Chen; Ya-Chen Lee; Sheng-Shiung Chen; Li-Fong Lin; Wen-Hsuan Hou; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

4.  Establishing dimensionality of sexual behaviours in patients with regional brain dysfunction.

Authors:  Robert A Fieo; Hannah Silverman; Deirdre O'Shea; Masood Manoochehri; Jordan Grafman; Edward D Huey
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Older adults with poor self-rated memory have less depressive symptoms and better memory performance when perceived self-efficacy is high.

Authors:  Deirdre M O'Shea; Vonetta M Dotson; Robert A Fieo; Angeliki Tsapanou; Laura Zahodne; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.485

6.  The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire revisited: a psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Muirne C S Paap; Danny Brouwer; Cees A W Glas; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Benjamin Forstreuter; Marcel E Pieterse; Job van der Palen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Psychometric properties of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III): An item response theory approach.

Authors:  Carlos Calderón; Christian Beyle; Oscar Véliz-García; Juan Bekios-Calfa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  What are the minimal sample size requirements for Mokken scaling? An empirical example with the Warwick- Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale.

Authors:  Roger Watson; Iris J L Egberink; Lisa Kirke; Jorge N Tendeiro; Frank Doyle
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2018-08-08

9.  Scale validation in applied health research: tutorial for a 6-step R-based psychometrics protocol.

Authors:  Alexandra L Dima
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-10

10.  Screening for depressed mood in an adolescent psychiatric context by brief self-assessment scales--testing psychometric validity of WHO-5 and BDI-6 indices by latent trait analyses.

Authors:  Eva Henje Blom; Per Bech; Göran Högberg; Jan Olov Larsson; Eva Serlachius
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.