Literature DB >> 21883403

Academic dismissal policy for medical students: effect on study progress and help-seeking behaviour.

Karen M Stegers-Jager1, Janke Cohen-Schotanus, Ted A W Splinter, Axel P N Themmen.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Medical students often fail to finish medical school within the designated time. An academic dismissal (AD) policy aims to enforce satisfactory progress and to enable early identification and timely support or referral of struggling students. In this study, we assessed whether the implementation of an AD policy improved study progress in the first 2 years of medical school. Additionally, we analysed its effect on the help-seeking behaviour of struggling students.
METHODS: We compared two AD cohorts (entering in 2005 and 2006, respectively) and two non-AD cohorts (entering in 2003 and 2004, respectively) on dropout rates, Year 1 curriculum completion rates and the percentage of students with an optimal study rate (i.e. all modules completed) at 1 and 2 years after enrolment. We also measured the effect on study progress of attending the support meetings offered.
RESULTS: The AD (n = 809) and non-AD cohorts (n = 809) did not differ significantly in dropout rate at 5 months, in Year 1 completion rate at 2 years and in the percentage of optimally performing students at 1 year after enrolment. At 2 years after enrolment, more students from the AD cohorts had left and more non-AD students demonstrated optimal performance, but effect sizes (ESs) for these differences were small. Voluntary support at 4 months was attended by AD students more often than by non-AD students (68.9% versus 39.8%; χ(2) ((1)) = 43.95, p < 0.001, ES = 0.29). The AD students who attended the support meetings completed the Year 1 curriculum more often than those who did not (73.4% versus 52.5%; χ(2) ((1)) = 10.92, p < 0.001, ES = 0.20). Attending the obligatory support meeting at 7 months had a similar effect (70.5% versus 33.3%; χ(2) ((1)) = 13.60, p < 0.001, ES = 0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an AD policy did not lead to earlier dropout, higher completion rates or an improved study rate during the first 2 years at medical school. However, uptake of the support offered increased to almost 70%. Although support participants finished the Year 1 curriculum more often than non-participants, the current support system was not sufficient to improve overall study progress. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21883403     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04004.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  10 in total

1.  Justice and care: decision making by medical school student promotions committees.

Authors:  Emily P Green; Philip A Gruppuso
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Exploring the Cultivation of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) Strategies Among Pre-Clinical Medical Students in Two Medical Schools.

Authors:  Shuh Shing Lee; Dujeepa D Samarasekera; Joong Hiong Sim; Wei-Han Hong; Chan Choong Foong; Vinod Pallath; Jamuna Vadivelu
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-12-26

3.  Binding study advice: effect of raising the standards?

Authors:  Karen M Stegers-Jager; Axel P N Themmen
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

4.  Ethnic and social disparities in different types of examinations in undergraduate pre-clinical training.

Authors:  K M Stegers-Jager; F N Brommet; A P N Themmen
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.853

5.  Untying the Gordian knot: remediation problems in medical schools that need remediation.

Authors:  Layne D Bennion; Steven J Durning; Jeffrey LaRochelle; Michelle Yoon; Deanna Schreiber-Gregory; Brian V Reamy; Dario Torre
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  The role of the assessment policy in the relation between learning and performance.

Authors:  Rob Kickert; Karen M Stegers-Jager; Marieke Meeuwisse; Peter Prinzie; Lidia R Arends
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Early identification of struggling learners: using prematriculation and early academic performance data.

Authors:  Layne D Bennion; Dario Torre; Steven J Durning; David Mears; Deanna Schreiber-Gregory; Jessica T Servey; David F Cruess; Michelle Yoon; Ting Dong
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-10

8.  Guidelines: The dos, don'ts and don't knows of remediation in medical education.

Authors:  Calvin L Chou; Adina Kalet; Manuel Joao Costa; Jennifer Cleland; Kalman Winston
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

9.  Medical school attrition-beyond the statistics a ten year retrospective study.

Authors:  Bridget M Maher; Helen Hynes; Catherine Sweeney; Ali S Khashan; Margaret O'Rourke; Kieran Doran; Anne Harris; Siun O' Flynn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Gender-specific effects of raising Year-1 standards on medical students' academic performance and stress levels.

Authors:  Karen M Stegers-Jager; Mesut Savas; Jeroen van der Waal; Elisabeth F C van Rossum; Andrea M Woltman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 6.251

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.