BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The chemokine receptor CXCR3 is a GPCR found predominantly on activated T cells. CXCR3 is activated by three endogenous peptides; CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11. Recently, a small-molecule agonist, VUF10661, has been reported in the literature and synthesized in our laboratory. The aim of the present study was to provide a detailed pharmacological characterization of VUF10661 by comparing its effects with those of CXCL11. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Agonistic properties of VUF10661 were assessed in a chemotaxis assay with murine L1.2 cells transiently transfected with cDNA encoding the human CXCR3 receptor and in binding studies, with [(125)I]-CXCL10 and [(125)I]-CXCL11, on membrane preparations from HEK293 cells stably expressing CXCR3. [(35)S]-GTPγS binding was used to determine its potency to induce CXCR3-mediated G protein activation and BRET-based assays to investigate its effects on intracellular cAMP levels and β-arrestin recruitment. KEY RESULTS: VUF10661 acted as a partial agonist in CXCR3-mediated chemotaxis, bound to CXCR3 in an allosteric fashion in ligand binding assays and activated G(i) proteins with the same efficacy as CXCL11 in the [(35)S]-GTPγS binding and cAMP assay, while it recruited more β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2 to CXCR3 receptors than the chemokine. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: VUF10661, like CXCL11, activates both G protein-dependent and -independent signalling via the CXCR3 receptor, but probably exerts its effects from an allosteric binding site that is different from that for CXCL11. It could stabilize different receptor and/or β-arrestin conformations leading to differences in functional output. Such ligand-biased signalling might offer interesting options for the therapeutic use of CXCR3 agonists.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The chemokine receptor CXCR3 is a GPCR found predominantly on activated T cells. CXCR3 is activated by three endogenous peptides; CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11. Recently, a small-molecule agonist, VUF10661, has been reported in the literature and synthesized in our laboratory. The aim of the present study was to provide a detailed pharmacological characterization of VUF10661 by comparing its effects with those of CXCL11. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Agonistic properties of VUF10661 were assessed in a chemotaxis assay with murine L1.2 cells transiently transfected with cDNA encoding the humanCXCR3 receptor and in binding studies, with [(125)I]-CXCL10 and [(125)I]-CXCL11, on membrane preparations from HEK293 cells stably expressing CXCR3. [(35)S]-GTPγS binding was used to determine its potency to induce CXCR3-mediated G protein activation and BRET-based assays to investigate its effects on intracellular cAMP levels and β-arrestin recruitment. KEY RESULTS:VUF10661 acted as a partial agonist in CXCR3-mediated chemotaxis, bound to CXCR3 in an allosteric fashion in ligand binding assays and activated G(i) proteins with the same efficacy as CXCL11 in the [(35)S]-GTPγS binding and cAMP assay, while it recruited more β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2 to CXCR3 receptors than the chemokine. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: VUF10661, like CXCL11, activates both G protein-dependent and -independent signalling via the CXCR3 receptor, but probably exerts its effects from an allosteric binding site that is different from that for CXCL11. It could stabilize different receptor and/or β-arrestin conformations leading to differences in functional output. Such ligand-biased signalling might offer interesting options for the therapeutic use of CXCR3 agonists.
Authors: S Qin; J B Rottman; P Myers; N Kassam; M Weinblatt; M Loetscher; A E Koch; B Moser; C R Mackay Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-02-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: M Loetscher; B Gerber; P Loetscher; S A Jones; L Piali; I Clark-Lewis; M Baggiolini; B Moser Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1996-09-01 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: C A Kollias-Baker; J Ruble; M Jacobson; J K Harrison; M Ozeck; J C Shryock; L Belardinelli Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: K E Cole; C A Strick; T J Paradis; K T Ogborne; M Loetscher; R P Gladue; W Lin; J G Boyd; B Moser; D E Wood; B G Sahagan; K Neote Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1998-06-15 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Jeffrey S Smith; Lowell T Nicholson; Jutamas Suwanpradid; Rachel A Glenn; Nicole M Knape; Priya Alagesan; Jaimee N Gundry; Thomas S Wehrman; Amber Reck Atwater; Michael D Gunn; Amanda S MacLeod; Sudarshan Rajagopal Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Anne O Watts; Folkert Verkaar; Miranda M C van der Lee; Claudia A W Timmerman; Martien Kuijer; Jody van Offenbeek; Lambertus H C J van Lith; Martine J Smit; Rob Leurs; Guido J R Zaman; Henry F Vischer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Marta Arimont; Shan-Liang Sun; Rob Leurs; Martine Smit; Iwan J P de Esch; Chris de Graaf Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: A O Watts; M M H van Lipzig; W C Jaeger; R M Seeber; M van Zwam; J Vinet; M M C van der Lee; M Siderius; G J R Zaman; H W G M Boddeke; M J Smit; K D G Pfleger; R Leurs; H F Vischer Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Sabrina M de Munnik; Albert J Kooistra; Jody van Offenbeek; Saskia Nijmeijer; Chris de Graaf; Martine J Smit; Rob Leurs; Henry F Vischer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Raffaele Altara; Yu-Mei Gu; Harry A J Struijker-Boudier; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen; W Matthijs Blankesteijn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 3.240