Literature DB >> 21883132

A cohort evaluation of the paediatric i-gel(™) airway during anaesthesia in 120 children.

R M Beringer1, F Kelly, T M Cook, J Nolan, R Hardy, T Simpson, M C White.   

Abstract

We studied the i-gel™ in 120 anaesthetised children (92 boys, 28 girls; median (IQR [range]) age (3 -7 [0.4 -13]) years and weight 19 (15-26 [7-35]) kg) to assess efficacy and usability. Insertion was successful on the first/second/third attempt in 110/8/1 children and failed in one child. Median (IQR [range]) insertion time was 14 (9-16 [6-200]) s. Manual ventilation was possible in all cases, although excess leak precluded a tidal volume above 7 ml.kg(-1) in three children. Fibreoptic inspection through the i-gel revealed a clear view of the vocal cords in 40 out of 46 cases (87%). Median (IQR [range]) leak pressure was 20 (16-26 [8-30]) cmH(2) O. During maintenance of anaesthesia, 16 manipulations were required in 11 children to improve the airway. One child regurgitated without aspirating. Other complications and side effects were infrequent. The i-gel was inserted without complications, establishing a clear airway and enabling spontaneous and controlled ventilation, in 113 (94%) children.
© 2011 The Authors. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21883132     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06884.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  15 in total

1.  An evaluation of the I-gel supraglottic airway in 70 pediatric patients.

Authors:  Tze Yeng Yeoh; Koo Boon Chan; Lynn S H Yeo; Eugene H C Liu; Terry L T Pan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings.

Authors:  Aya Fukuhara; Ryu Okutani; Yutaka Oda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Airway management devices for general anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kirti N Saxena
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04

4.  Performance of size 1 I-gel compared with size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized infants and neonates.

Authors:  Gulay Erdogan Kayhan; Zekine Begec; Mukadder Sanli; Ender Gedik; Mahmut Durmus
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-22

5.  A comparison of i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ in anesthetized and paralyzed children.

Authors:  Hyuk Kim; Ji Yeon Lee; Seung Yoon Lee; Sang Yoong Park; Seung Cheol Lee; Chan Jong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-11-26

6.  A randomised trial to compare i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients.

Authors:  R Nirupa; Satinder Gombar; Vanita Ahuja; Preeti Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-10

7.  A Survey of Current Practice of Supraglottic Airway Devices in Pediatric Anesthesia from India.

Authors:  Suvarna Kaniyil; P B Smithamol; Elizabeth Joseph; A Krishnadas; K T Ramadas
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Swati Gupta; Neelam Dogra; Kanchan Chauhan
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

9.  A comparison of supraglottic airway i-gel™ vs. classic laryngeal mask airway in small children.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Lee; Hyun-Seok Cho; Won-Jung Shin; Hong-Seuk Yang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-02-28

10.  Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sang Yoong Park; Jong Cheol Rim; Hyuk Kim; Ji Hyeon Lee; Chan Jong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.