Literature DB >> 21882677

Performance of Apis mellifera, Bombus impatiens, and Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as pollinators of pumpkin.

Derek R Artz1, Brian A Nault.   

Abstract

Pollination services of pumpkin, Cucurbita pepo L., provided by the European honey bee, Apis mellifera L., were compared with two native bee species, the common eastern bumble bee, Bombus impatiens (Cresson), and Peponapis pruinosa Say, in New York from 2008 to 2010. Performance of each species was determined by comparing single-visit pollen deposition, percentage of visits that contacted the stigma, flower-handling time, fruit and seed set, and fruit weight per number of visits. Fruit yield from small fields (0.6 ha) supplemented with commercial B. impatiens colonies was compared with yield from those not supplemented. A. mellifera spent nearly 2 and 3 times longer foraging on each pistillate flower compared with B. impatiens and P. pruinosa, respectively. A. mellifera also visited pistillate flowers 10-20 times more frequently than B. impatiens and P. pruinosa, respectively. Yet, B. impatiens deposited 3 times more pollen grains per stigma and contacted stigmas significantly more often than either A. mellifera or P. pruinosa. Fruit set and weight from flowers visited four to eight times by B. impatiens were similar to those from open-pollinated flowers, whereas flowers pollinated by A. mellifera and P. pruinosa produced fewer fruit and smaller fruit compared with those from open-pollinated flowers. Fields supplemented with B. impatiens produced significantly more pumpkins per plant than nonsupplemented fields. B. impatiens was a better pollinator of pumpkin than P. pruinosa and should be considered as a promising alternative to A. mellifera for pollinating this crop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21882677     DOI: 10.1603/ec10431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  16 in total

1.  Demographic benefits of early season resources for bumble bee (B. vosnesenskii) colonies.

Authors:  Rosemary L Malfi; Elizabeth Crone; Neal Williams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Mutualism has its limits: consequences of asymmetric interactions between a well-defended plant and its herbivorous pollinator.

Authors:  Maria Sol Balbuena; Geoffrey T Broadhead; Ajinkya Dahake; Emily Barnett; Melissa Vergara; Krissa A Skogen; Tania Jogesh; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Movement of soil-applied imidacloprid and thiamethoxam into nectar and pollen of squash (Cucurbita pepo).

Authors:  Kimberly A Stoner; Brian D Eitzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Managed bumblebees outperform honeybees in increasing peach fruit set in China: different limiting processes with different pollinators.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Jiaxing Huang; Paul H Williams; Bernard E Vaissière; Zhiyong Zhou; Qinbao Gai; Jie Dong; Jiandong An
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Contrasting Pollinators and Pollination in Native and Non-Native Regions of Highbush Blueberry Production.

Authors:  Jason Gibbs; Elizabeth Elle; Kyle Bobiwash; Tiia Haapalainen; Rufus Isaacs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Use of video surveillance to measure the influences of habitat management and landscape composition on pollinator visitation and pollen deposition in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) agroecosystems.

Authors:  Benjamin W Phillips; Mary M Gardiner
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Pollination services provided by bees in pumpkin fields supplemented with either Apis mellifera or Bombus impatiens or not supplemented.

Authors:  Jessica D Petersen; Stephen Reiners; Brian A Nault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Potential Influence of Bumble Bee Visitation on Foraging Behaviors and Assemblages of Honey Bees on Squash Flowers in Highland Agricultural Ecosystems.

Authors:  Zhenghua Xie; Dongdong Pan; Jonathan Teichroew; Jiandong An
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sensitivity of commercial pumpkin yield to potential decline among different groups of pollinating bees.

Authors:  Sonja C Pfister; Philipp W Eckerter; Jens Schirmel; James E Cresswell; Martin H Entling
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Pan Traps for Tracking Honey Bee Activity-Density: A Case Study in Soybeans.

Authors:  Ashley L St Clair; Adam G Dolezal; Matthew E O'Neal; Amy L Toth
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.