Literature DB >> 21882546

Modelling the energy demands of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment.

I Martin1, M Pidou, A Soares, S Judd, B Jefferson.   

Abstract

A modelling study has been developed in which the energy requirements of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors (MBRs) are assessed in order to compare these two wastewater treatment technologies. The model took into consideration the aeration required for biological oxidation in aerobic MBRs (AeMBRs), the energy recovery from methane production in anaerobic MBRs (AnMBRs) and the energy demands of operating submerged and sidestream membrane configurations. Aeration and membrane energy demands were estimated based on previously developed modelling studies populated with operational data from the literature. Given the difference in sludge production between aerobic and anaerobic systems, the model was benchmarked by assuming high sludge retention times or complete retention of solids in both AeMBRs and AnMBRs. Analysis of biogas production in AnMBRs revealed that the heat required to achieve mesophilic temperatures (35 degrees C) in the reactor was only possible with influent wastewater strengths above 4-5 g COD L(-1). The general trend of the submerged configuration, which is less energy intensive than the sidestream configuration in aerobic systems, was not observed in AnMBRs, mainly due to the wide variation in gas demand utilized in anaerobic systems. Compared to AeMBRs, for which the energy requirements were estimated to approach 2 kWh m(-3) (influent up to 1 g COD L(-1)), the energy demands associated with fouling control in AnMBRs were lower (0.80 kWh m(-3) for influent of 1.14 g COD L(-1)), although due to the low fluxes reported in the literature capital costs associated with membrane material would be three times higher than this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21882546     DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2011.565806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Technol        ISSN: 0959-3330            Impact factor:   3.247


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of backwashing efficiency in dead-end hollow-fibre ultrafiltration of anaerobic suspensions.

Authors:  Luisa Vera; Enrique González; Ignacio Ruigómez; Jenniffer Gómez; Sebastián Delgado
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Design and evaluation of degassed anaerobic membrane biofilm reactors for improved methane recovery.

Authors:  Brian C Crone; George A Sorial; Jonathan G Pressman; Hodon Ryu; Scott P Keely; Nichole Brinkman; Christina Bennett-Stamper; Jay L Garland
Journal:  Bioresour Technol Rep       Date:  2020-06-01

3.  Energy and greenhouse gas life cycle assessment and cost analysis of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor systems: Influence of scale, population density, climate, and methane recovery.

Authors:  Sarah Cashman; Xin Ma; Janet Mosley; Jay Garland; Brian Crone; Xiaobo Xue
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 4.  Methanogens: biochemical background and biotechnological applications.

Authors:  Franziska Enzmann; Florian Mayer; Michael Rother; Dirk Holtmann
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 5.  A Review on the Mechanism, Impacts and Control Methods of Membrane Fouling in MBR System.

Authors:  Xianjun Du; Yaoke Shi; Veeriah Jegatheesan; Izaz Ul Haq
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-04

6.  A Rotary Spacer System for Energy-Efficient Membrane Fouling Control in Oil/Water Emulsion Filtration.

Authors:  Normi Izati Mat Nawi; Afiq Mohd Lazis; Aulia Rahma; Muthia Elma; Muhammad Roil Bilad; Nik Abdul Hadi Md Nordin; Mohd Dzul Hakim Wirzal; Norazanita Shamsuddin; Hazwani Suhaimi; Norhaniza Yusof
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26

7.  Assessment of an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) Treating Medium-Strength Synthetic Wastewater under Cyclical Membrane Operation.

Authors:  Ahmet E Uman; Robert A Bair; Daniel H Yeh
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31

8.  Submerged Osmotic Processes: Design and Operation to Mitigate Mass Transfer Limitations.

Authors:  Gaetan Blandin; Ignasi Rodriguez-Roda; Joaquim Comas
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-01

Review 9.  Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater Treatment: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Yerkanat N Kanafin; Dinara Kanafina; Simos Malamis; Evina Katsou; Vassilis J Inglezakis; Stavros G Poulopoulos; Elizabeth Arkhangelsky
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.