Literature DB >> 21881525

Relatively lower central aortic pressure in patients with impaired insulin sensitivity and resistance: the Toon Health Study.

Yasuharu Tabara1, Isao Saito, Wataru Nishida, Katsuhiko Kohara, Susumu Sakurai, Ryoichi Kawamura, Hiroshi Onuma, Yasunori Takata, Haruhiko Osawa, Tetsuro Miki, Takeshi Tanigawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Central aortic blood pressure (BP) has been postulated to correlate more closely with cardiovascular disease risk than brachial cuff BP. However, the effect of insulin sensitivity and resistance on central BP is not fully understood. Here, we evaluated the associations between insulin sensitivity/resistance and central BP using the oral glucose tolerance test.
METHODS: A total of 1034 Japanese participants were enrolled in this study. The absolute pressure of the late systolic peak (SBP2) of the brachial BP obtained by the radial waveform was considered to be the central systolic BP. Oral glucose tolerance test was performed by administering 75 g of glucose, and blood samples were obtained at 0, 60, 120 min after glucose loading.
RESULTS: Mean SBP2 was found to be lower than mean brachial systolic BP (SBP) (119 ± 20, 126 ± 19 mmHg, P < 0.001), and differences between SBP and SBP2 were significantly larger in patients with reduced insulin sensitivity (-8.2 ± 5.2, -7.2 ± 5.3, -7.1 ± 5.1, and -6.5 ± 4.9 mmHg, in the first, second, third and fourth quartiles, respectively; P = 0.002) and increased insulin resistance (-6.6 ± 5.1, -6.6 ± 4.8, -7.3 ± 4.8, -8.5 ± 5.6 mmHg, P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis identified reduced insulin sensitivity (β = 0.067, P = 0.033) and increased insulin resistance (β = -0.081, P = 0.009) as independent determinants of the difference between SBP and SBP2.
CONCLUSION: Given that both insulin sensitivity and insulin resistance were found to be significant determinants of the difference between SBP and SBP2 in a healthy general population, we suggest measuring the SBP2 in individuals with impaired insulin action in order to accurately assess their risk of developing cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21881525     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834abd06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  5 in total

Review 1.  Perspective: Cardiovascular Responses to Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Humans: A Narrative Review with Potential Hemodynamic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Cathriona R Monnard; Erik Konrad Grasser
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Which Measurement of Blood Pressure Is More Associated With Albuminuria in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Central Blood Pressure or Peripheral Blood Pressure?

Authors:  Noriyuki Kitagawa; Hiroshi Okada; Muhei Tanaka; Yoshitaka Hashimoto; Toshihiro Kimura; Koji Nakano; Masahiro Yamazaki; Goji Hasegawa; Naoto Nakamura; Michiaki Fukui
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-01-03       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Heart Rate Variability, Insulin Resistance, and Insulin Sensitivity in Japanese Adults: The Toon Health Study.

Authors:  Isao Saito; Shinichi Hitsumoto; Koutatsu Maruyama; Wataru Nishida; Eri Eguchi; Tadahiro Kato; Ryoichi Kawamura; Yasunori Takata; Hiroshi Onuma; Haruhiko Osawa; Takeshi Tanigawa
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.211

4.  Relationships between serum free fatty acid and pulse pressure amplification in overweight/obese men: insights from exercise training and dietary modification.

Authors:  Toru Yoshikawa; Asako Zempo-Miyaki; Hiroshi Kumagai; Kanae Myoenzono; Rina So; Takehiko Tsujimoto; Kiyoji Tanaka; Seiji Maeda
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.114

5.  Low birthweight is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japanese adults: The Toon Health Study.

Authors:  Maki Yokoyama; Isao Saito; Megumi Ueno; Hiroaki Kato; Ayaka Yoshida; Ryoichi Kawamura; Koutatsu Maruyama; Yasunori Takata; Haruhiko Osawa; Takeshi Tanigawa; Takashi Sugiyama
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.232

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.