Literature DB >> 21880827

Developing chemical genetic approaches to explore G protein-coupled receptor function: validation of the use of a receptor activated solely by synthetic ligand (RASSL).

Elisa Alvarez-Curto1, Rudi Prihandoko, Christofer S Tautermann, Jurriaan M Zwier, John D Pediani, Martin J Lohse, Carsten Hoffmann, Andrew B Tobin, Graeme Milligan.   

Abstract

Molecular evolution and chemical genetics have been applied to generate functional pairings of mutated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and nonendogenous ligands. These mutant receptors, referred to as receptors activated solely by synthetic ligands (RASSLs) or designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs), have huge potential to define physiological roles of GPCRs and to validate receptors in animal models as therapeutic targets to treat human disease. However, appreciation of ligand bias and functional selectivity of different ligands at the same receptor suggests that RASSLs may signal differently than wild-type receptors activated by endogenous agonists. We assessed this by generating forms of wild-type human M(3) muscarinic receptor and a RASSL variant that responds selectively to clozapine N-oxide. Although the RASSL receptor had reduced affinity for muscarinic antagonists, including atropine, stimulation with clozapine N-oxide produced effects very similar to those generated by acetylcholine at the wild-type M(3)-receptor. Such effects included the relative movement of the third intracellular loop and C-terminal tail of intramolecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer sensors and the ability of the wild type and evolved mutant to regulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation. Each form interacted similarly with β-arrestin 2 and was internalized from the cell surface in response to the appropriate ligand. Furthermore, the pattern of phosphorylation of specific serine residues within the evolved receptor in response to clozapine N-oxide was very similar to that produced by acetylcholine at the wild type. Such results provide confidence that, at least for the M(3) muscarinic receptor, results obtained after transgenic expression of this RASSL are likely to mirror the actions of acetylcholine at the wild type receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21880827      PMCID: PMC3228535          DOI: 10.1124/mol.111.074674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  44 in total

1.  Preferential transformation of human neuronal cells by human adenoviruses and the origin of HEK 293 cells.

Authors:  Gerry Shaw; Silas Morse; Miguel Ararat; Frank L Graham
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2002-04-10       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Role of conserved threonine and tyrosine residues in acetylcholine binding and muscarinic receptor activation. A study with m3 muscarinic receptor point mutants.

Authors:  J Wess; R Maggio; J R Palmer; Z Vogel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Ligand-induced internalization of the orexin OX(1) and cannabinoid CB(1) receptors assessed via N-terminal SNAP and CLIP-tagging.

Authors:  Richard J Ward; John D Pediani; Graeme Milligan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  A FlAsH-based FRET approach to determine G protein-coupled receptor activation in living cells.

Authors:  Carsten Hoffmann; Guido Gaietta; Moritz Bünemann; Stephen R Adams; Silke Oberdorff-Maass; Björn Behr; Jean-Pierre Vilardaga; Roger Y Tsien; Mark H Ellisman; Martin J Lohse
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Probing the beta2 adrenoceptor binding site with catechol reveals differences in binding and activation by agonists and partial agonists.

Authors:  Gayathri Swaminath; Xavier Deupi; Tae Weon Lee; Wen Zhu; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; Brian Kobilka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  The use of G-protein coupled receptor models in lead optimization.

Authors:  Christofer S Tautermann
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.808

7.  Conditional expression and signaling of a specifically designed Gi-coupled receptor in transgenic mice.

Authors:  C H Redfern; P Coward; M Y Degtyarev; E K Lee; A T Kwa; L Hennighausen; H Bujard; G I Fishman; B R Conklin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  FRET-based sensors for the human M1-, M3-, and M5-acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Nicole Ziegler; Julia Bätz; Ulrike Zabel; Martin J Lohse; Carsten Hoffmann
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice: novel phenotypes and clinical implications.

Authors:  Jürgen Wess
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.820

10.  Orexin-1 receptor-cannabinoid CB1 receptor heterodimerization results in both ligand-dependent and -independent coordinated alterations of receptor localization and function.

Authors:  James Ellis; John D Pediani; Meritxell Canals; Sandra Milasta; Graeme Milligan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  23 in total

1.  Intramolecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) sensors of the orexin OX1 and OX2 receptors identify slow kinetics of agonist activation.

Authors:  Tian-Rui Xu; Richard J Ward; John D Pediani; Graeme Milligan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Optical probes based on G protein-coupled receptors - added work or added value?

Authors:  A D Stumpf; C Hoffmann
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  A G Protein-biased Designer G Protein-coupled Receptor Useful for Studying the Physiological Relevance of Gq/11-dependent Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Jianxin Hu; Matthew Stern; Luis E Gimenez; Lizzy Wanka; Lu Zhu; Mario Rossi; Jaroslawna Meister; Asuka Inoue; Annette G Beck-Sickinger; Vsevolod V Gurevich; Jürgen Wess
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  New concepts in pharmacological efficacy at 7TM receptors: IUPHAR review 2.

Authors:  Terry Kenakin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Optogenetic approaches for dissecting neuromodulation and GPCR signaling in neural circuits.

Authors:  Skylar M Spangler; Michael R Bruchas
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 5.547

6.  Design and functional characterization of a novel, arrestin-biased designer G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Ken-ichiro Nakajima; Jürgen Wess
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 7.  Pharmacosynthetics: Reimagining the pharmacogenetic approach.

Authors:  Martilias S Farrell; Bryan L Roth
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  A novel experimental strategy to assess the metabolic effects of selective activation of a G(q)-coupled receptor in hepatocytes in vivo.

Authors:  Jian Hua Li; Shalini Jain; Sara M McMillin; Yinghong Cui; Dinesh Gautam; Wataru Sakamoto; Huiyan Lu; William Jou; Owen P McGuinness; Oksana Gavrilova; Jürgen Wess
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 9.  Novel designer receptors to probe GPCR signaling and physiology.

Authors:  Jürgen Wess; Kenichiro Nakajima; Shalini Jain
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 10.  Novel insights into M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor physiology and structure.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Jianhua Li; Jianxin Hu; Brian K Kobilka; Jürgen Wess
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.