Literature DB >> 21880576

The yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with clinical stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA breast cancer: a prospective study.

David Groheux1, Sylvie Giacchetti, Marc Espié, Laetitia Vercellino, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Marc Delord, Nathalie Berenger, Marie-Elisabeth Toubert, Jean-Louis Misset, Elif Hindié.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA breast cancer.
METHODS: During 56 mo, 131 consecutive patients with large (>2 cm) breast cancer and clinical stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA (based on clinical examination, mammography, breast MRI, and ultrasonography) underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The nuclear physician was unaware of the results of any other procedure (bone scan, chest radiography, liver ultrasound, or thoracoabdominal CT scan).
RESULTS: Of the 131 examined patients, 36 had clinical stage IIA (34 T2N0 and 2 T1N1), 48 stage IIB (20 T3N0 and 28 T2N1), and 47 stage IIIA (29 T3N1, 9 T2N2, and 9 T3N2). (18)F-FDG PET/CT modified staging for 5.6% of stage IIA patients, for 14.6% of stage IIB patients, and for 27.6% of stage IIIA patients. However, within stage IIIA, the yield was specifically high among the 18 patients with N2 disease (56% stage modification). When considering stage IIB and primary operable IIIA (T3N1) together, the yield of (18)F-FDG PET/CT was 13% (10/77); extraaxillary regional lymph nodes were detected in 5 and distant metastases in 7 patients. In this series, (18)F-FDG PET/CT outperformed bone scanning, with only 1 misclassification versus 8 for bone scanning (P = 0.036).
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT provided useful information in 13% of patients with clinical T3N0, T2N1, or T3N1 disease. The yield was more modest in patients with stage IIA. The high yield in the case of N2 disease demonstrates that stage IIIA comprises 2 quite distinct groups of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21880576     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  29 in total

Review 1.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasuo Miyoshi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of large breast cancer when compared with conventional explorations.

Authors:  Alexandre Cochet; Inna Dygai-Cochet; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Olivier Humbert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Séverine Guiu; Charles Coutant; Bruno Coudert; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  (18) F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer patients - Is there a relevant impact on treatment planning compared to conventional staging modalities?

Authors:  J Krammer; A Schnitzer; C G Kaiser; K A Buesing; E Sperk; J Brade; S Wasgindt; M Suetterlin; S O Schoenberg; E J Sutton; K Wasser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Appearance of untreated bone metastases from breast cancer on FDG PET/CT: importance of histologic subtype.

Authors:  Brittany Z Dashevsky; Debra A Goldman; Molly Parsons; Mithat Gönen; Adriana D Corben; Maxine S Jochelson; Clifford A Hudis; Monica Morrow; Gary A Ulaner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Preoperative FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients: where are we going?

Authors:  Laura Gilardi; Concetta De Cicco; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Molly P Hogan; Debra A Goldman; Brittany Dashevsky; Christopher C Riedl; Mithat Gönen; Joseph R Osborne; Maxine Jochelson; Clifford Hudis; Monica Morrow; Gary A Ulaner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Clinical utility of 18F-FDG-PET/MR for preoperative breast cancer staging.

Authors:  Diomidis Botsikas; Anastasia Kalovidouri; Minerva Becker; Michele Copercini; Dahila Amal Djema; Alexandre Bodmer; Sindy Monnier; Christoph D Becker; Xavier Montet; Benedicte M A Delattre; Osman Ratib; Valentina Garibotto; Claire Tabouret-Viaud
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Koosha Paydary; Siavash Mehdizadeh Seraj; Mahdi Zirakchian Zadeh; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Sara Pourhassan Shamchi; Saeid Gholami; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Could semiquantitative FDG analysis add information to the prognosis in patients with stage II/III breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant treatment?

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Anna Rita Cervino; Cristina Ghiotto; Tania Saibene; Silvia Michieletto; Bozza Fernando; Enrico Orvieto; Valentina Guarneri; Pierfranco Conte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years.

Authors:  Christopher C Riedl; Elina Slobod; Maxine Jochelson; Monica Morrow; Debra A Goldman; Mithat Gonen; Wolfgang A Weber; Gary A Ulaner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.