| Literature DB >> 21880140 |
Hedi Ben Mansour1, Sonia Yatouji, Sihem Mbarek, Ikram Houas, Afef Delai, Dorra Dridi.
Abstract
For centuries, plants have been used in traditional medicines and there has been recent interest in the chemopreventive properties of compounds derived from plants. In the present study, we investigated the antibutyrylcholinestrasic (anti-BuChE) and antioxidant (against some free radicals) activities of extracts from Rhus pentaphyllum. Aqueous extracts were prepared from powdered R. pentaphyllum roots, leaves and seeds and characterized for the presence of tannins, flavonoids and coumarins. Seeds aqueous extract contained the highest quantities of both flavonoids and tannins (21.12% and 17.45% respectively). In the same way, seeds extracts displayed remarkable inhibition against BuChE over 95%, at 100 μg/ml and with IC50 0.74 μg/ml. In addition, compared to leaves and roots extracts, seeds aqueous extract revealed relatively strong antiradical activity towards the ABTS.+ (IC50 = 0.25 μg/ml) and DPPH (IC50 = 2.71 μg/ml) free radicals and decreased significantly the reactive oxygen species such O2.- (IC50 = 2.9 μg/ml) formation evaluated by the non-enzymatic generating O2.- system (Nitroblue tetrazolium/riboflavine). These data suggest that the anti-BuChE activities mechanism of these extracts occurs through a free radical scavenging capacities.The present study indicates that extracts of Rhus pentaphyllum leaves, seeds and roots are a significant source of compounds, such as tannins, flavonoids and coumarins, with anti-BuChE and antioxidant activities, and thus may be useful for chemoprevention.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21880140 PMCID: PMC3224538 DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-10-32
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Qualitative phytochemical screening of extracts from Rhus pentaphyllum
| Seeds aqueous extract | Leaves aqueous extract | Roots aqueous extract | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tannins | ++ | ++ | ++++ |
| Flavonoids | ++++ | ++ | - |
| Anthraquinones | - | - | - |
| Alkaloids | - | - | - |
| Coumarins | ++ | - | - |
| Saponosids | - | - | - |
−: not detectable; ++: high quantities, ++++: very high quantities.
Quantitative Phytochemical Screening (%) of extracts from Rhus pentaphyllum
| Seed aqueous extract | Leaves aqueous extract | Roots aqueous extract | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tannins | 17.45* | 10.31 | 35.51** |
| Flavonoids | 21.12** | 12.3** | 0 |
Significant difference obtained with: *P < 0.05: **P < 0.01
The reported comparisons concern the contents of extracts in the flavonoids and tannins.
Percentage of inhibitions of butyrylcholinesterase activity by the three aqueous extracts from Rhus pentaphyllum
| Tested compounds | Concentration (μg/ml) | Inhibition (%) against BuChE | IC50 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seeds aqueous extract | 1 | 57.11 ± 2.00* | 0.74 |
| 10 | 80.34 ± 2.25** | ||
| 100 | 94.93 ± 2.00** | ||
| Leaves aqueous extract | 1 | 54.78 ± 1.25* | 0.81 |
| 10 | 76.30 ± 1.50* | ||
| 100 | 87.11 ± 5.50* | ||
| Roots aqueous extract | 1 | 32.25 ± 2.35 | 10.35 |
| 10 | 49.01 ± 3.25 | ||
| 100 | 67.81 ± 3.67* | ||
| (a) Galanthamine | 1 | 44.5 ± 1.00 | 7.9 |
| 10 | 59.44 ± 2.5* | ||
| 100 | 67.5 ± 2.5* | ||
Significant difference obtained with: *P < 0.05: **P < 0.01
The reported comparisons concern: Seeds aqueous extract versus control(a), leaves aqueous extract versus control(a) and roots aqueous extract versus control(a). Every concentration is compared with its equivalent in the other extract.
DPPH free-radical scavenging activity of extracts from Rhus pentaphyllum
| Extracts | Concentration | % | IC50 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seeds aqueous extract | 1 | 44.34 ± 2.30* | 2.71 |
| 3 | 53.45 ± 1.02* | ||
| 10 | 66.90 ± 1.10* | ||
| 30 | 80.51 ± 2.80** | ||
| 100 | 92.12 ± 2.11** | ||
| Leaves aqueous extract | 1 | 39.45 ± 0.91 | 2.91 |
| 3 | 50.45 ± 0.75* | ||
| 10 | 64.31 ± 1.50* | ||
| 30 | 79.50 ± 2.80* | ||
| 100 | 88.11 ± 2.55** | ||
| Roots aqueous extract | 1 | 12.12 ± 0.80 | 10.10 |
| 3 | 34.51 ± 1.35 | ||
| 10 | 49.51 ± 2.10 | ||
| 30 | 63.67 ± 1.12* | ||
| 100 | 70.11 ± 3.11* | ||
| (a) α-Tocopherol | 1 | 30 ± 2.1 | 3 |
| 3 | 50 ± 1.3 | ||
| 10 | 97.3 ± 1.8** | ||
| 30 | 98 ± 1.3** | ||
| 100 | 98.7 ± 2.2** | ||
Significant difference obtained with: *P < 0.05: **P < 0.01,
The reported comparisons concern: Seeds aqueous extract versus roots aqueous extract, leaves aqueous extract versus roots aqueous extract and control(a) versus roots aqueous extract. Every concentration is compared with its equivalent in the other extract.
Concentration-dependent ABTSfree radical scavenging activity of Rhus pentaphyllum aqueous extracts and standard antioxidant Trolox
| Extracts | Concentration (mg/ml) | Inhibition (%) | TEAC (mM) | IC50 (mg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seeds aqueous extract | 0.5 | 76.4 ± 3.50* | 2.19 | 0.25 |
| 2.5 | 86.12 ± 4.25** | |||
| 4.5 | 98.77 ± 6.50** | |||
| 7.5 | 100 ± 1.00*** | |||
| 9.5 | 100 ± 1.50*** | |||
| Leaves aqueous extract | 0.5 | 61.7 ± 3.50* | 1.54 | 0.37 |
| 2.5 | 87.8 ± 4.40** | |||
| 4.5 | 89 ± 1.00** | |||
| 7.5 | 98 ± 0.50** | |||
| 9.5 | 100 ± 2.50*** | |||
| Roots aqueous extract | 0.5 | 44.1 ± 0.35 | 1.32 | 2.31 |
| 2.5 | 54 ± 1.10* | |||
| 4.5 | 67.13 ± 3.10* | |||
| 7.5 | 78.61 ± 5.10* | |||
| 9.5 | 86.50 ± 2.35** | |||
| (a) Trolox | 0.5 | 22.07 ± 0.25 | - | 0.76 |
| 0.625 | 32.21 ± 0.50 | |||
| 0.833 | 53.84 ± 1.50 | |||
| 1.25 | 65 ± 2.50 | |||
| 2.5 | 96.85 ± 2.80** | |||
TEAC: Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity
Significant difference obtained with: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
The reported comparisons concern: Seeds aqueous extract versus roots aqueous extract, leaves aqueous extract versus roots aqueous extract and control(a) versus roots aqueous extract. Every concentration is compared with its equivalent in the other extract.
Figure 1Scavenging effects of aqueous extracts of .