Literature DB >> 21878535

Randomized phase II trial of letrozole plus anti-MUC1 antibody AS1402 in hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Nuhad K Ibrahim1, Kemal O Yariz, Ihor Bondarenko, Alexei Manikhas, Vladimir Semiglazov, Anna Alyasova, Volodymyr Komisarenko, Yaroslav Shparyk, James Lee Murray, David Jones, Shai Senderovich, Albert Chau, Fredrik Erlandsson, Gary Acton, Mark Pegram.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: AS1402 is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 antibody that targets the aberrantly glycosylated antigen MUC1, which is overexpressed in 90% of breast tumors and contributes to estrogen-mediated growth and survival of breast cancer cells in vitro by modulating estrogen receptor (ER) activity. Aromatase inhibitors have been reported to enhance antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity elicited by antibodies in vitro. We compared the outcomes of patients with breast cancer treated with letrozole with or without AS1402. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The study population included 110 patients with locally advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer randomized to receive 2.5 mg letrozole only once daily or with a weekly 9 mg/kg AS1402 infusion. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, time to progression, and safety. AS1402 exposure and influence of allotypes of FcγRIIIa, FcγRIIa, and MUC1 were evaluated.
RESULTS: The study was stopped early because of a trend toward worse response rates and a higher rate of early disease progression in the AS1402 + letrozole arm. Final analysis revealed no significant difference in efficacy between the study arms. Evaluated gene polymorphisms did not define patient subgroups with improved outcomes. Addition of AS1402 to letrozole was associated with manageable toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Because adding AS1402 to letrozole did not improve outcomes compared with letrozole only, blocking ER may be a better strategy for harnessing MUC1 modulation of the ER to a clinical advantage. FcγRIIIa, FcγRIIa, and MUC1 allotype did not predict outcome for patients treated with letrozole with or without AS1402. ©2011 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21878535     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  29 in total

Review 1.  Simple sugars to complex disease--mucin-type O-glycans in cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Kudelka; Tongzhong Ju; Jamie Heimburg-Molinaro; Richard D Cummings
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 6.242

Review 2.  Recent advances in tumor associated carbohydrate antigen based chimeric antigen receptor T cells and bispecific antibodies for anti-cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Zahra Rashidijahanabad; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 11.130

3.  Combination of mAb-AR20.5, anti-PD-L1 and PolyICLC inhibits tumor progression and prolongs survival of MUC1.Tg mice challenged with pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Kamiya Mehla; Jarrod Tremayne; James A Grunkemeyer; Kelly A O'Connell; Maria M Steele; Thomas C Caffrey; Xinyi Zhu; Fang Yu; Pankaj K Singh; Birgit C Schultes; Ragupathy Madiyalakan; Christopher F Nicodemus; Michael A Hollingsworth
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  Targeting the human MUC1-C oncoprotein with an antibody-drug conjugate.

Authors:  Govind Panchamoorthy; Caining Jin; Deepak Raina; Ajit Bharti; Masaaki Yamamoto; Dennis Adeebge; Qing Zhao; Roderick Bronson; Shirley Jiang; Linjing Li; Yozo Suzuki; Ashujit Tagde; P Peter Ghoroghchian; Kwok-Kin Wong; Surender Kharbanda; Donald Kufe
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-06-21

Review 5.  Cancer-associated mucins: role in immune modulation and metastasis.

Authors:  Rakesh Bhatia; Shailendra K Gautam; Andrew Cannon; Christopher Thompson; Bradley R Hall; Abhijit Aithal; Kasturi Banerjee; Maneesh Jain; Joyce C Solheim; Sushil Kumar; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  Glycosylation of MUC1 influences the binding of a therapeutic antibody by altering the conformational equilibrium of the antigen.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Movahedin; Teresa M Brooks; Nitin T Supekar; Naveen Gokanapudi; Geert-Jan Boons; Cory L Brooks
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.313

Review 7.  MUC1-C oncoprotein as a target in breast cancer: activation of signaling pathways and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  D W Kufe
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  In vivo anti-MUC1+ tumor activity and sequences of high-affinity anti-MUC1-SEA antibodies.

Authors:  Daniel B Rubinstein; Daniel H Wreschner; Edward Pichinuk; Michael Chalik; Itai Benhar; Ravit Ginat-Koton; Ravit Ziv; Nechama I Smorodinsky; Gabi Haran; Christian Garbar; Armand Bensussan; Alan Meeker; Thierry Guillaume
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 9.  Preclinical Advances in Theranostics for the Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hanyi Fang; Alessandra Cavaliere; Ziqi Li; Yiyun Huang; Bernadette Marquez-Nostra
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Defucosylation of Tumor-Specific Humanized Anti-MUC1 Monoclonal Antibody Enhances NK Cell-Mediated Anti-Tumor Cell Cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Ying Gong; Roel G J Klein Wolterink; Valeriia Gulaia; Silvie Cloosen; Femke A I Ehlers; Lotte Wieten; Yvo F Graus; Gerard M J Bos; Wilfred T V Germeraad
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.