Literature DB >> 21877910

Classification and detection of errors in minimally invasive surgery.

Marie Claire Rassweiler1, Charalambos Mamoulakis, Hannes Gotz Kenngott, Jens Rassweiler, Jean de la Rosette, Maria Pilar Laguna.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive review of the classification of surgical errors as well as general measures to detect and prevent their occurrence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Search in PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane library with combination of the key words: Endoscopy or surgical procedures, minimally invasive, and medical error. Relevant articles were selected by three senior authors involved in minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
RESULTS: Error is an unintended healthcare outcome caused by a defect in the delivery of care to a patient. Surgical errors are common and account for half of all hospital adverse events (AEs). Urology is the fifth specialty in decreasing order of AE. Errors may be classified according to the place where they occur (co-face or systemic), to the outcomes (near miss, recovery, and remediation). A specific classification for errors in MIS has also been described (Cushieri), depending on the step of the surgical procedure in which they occur. Each classification serves definite purposes, and no one can be definitive over the others. No classification has been applied so far to urology. Detection through appropriate reporting is the basis for prevention.
CONCLUSION: Surgical errors represent a significant proportion of all medical error. Multiple classifications exist, depending on the purposes they are intended to serve. A classification based on the place of occurrence of the errors has been adopted in the medical system; however, when referring to MIS, a finer classification is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21877910     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

Review 1.  Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grivas; Ioannis Zachos; Georgios Georgiadis; Markos Karavitakis; Vasilis Tzortzis; Charalampos Mamoulakis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Transperineal laser ablation for percutaneous treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a feasibility study. Results at 6 and 12 months from a retrospective multi-centric study.

Authors:  Claudio Maurizio Pacella; Gianluigi Patelli; Gennaro Iapicca; Guglielmo Manenti; Tommaso Perretta; Colleen P Ryan; Renato Esposito; Giovanni Mauri
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Current issues in patient safety in surgery: a review.

Authors:  Fernando J Kim; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Diedra Gustafson; Leticia Nogueira; Timothy Harlin; David L Paul
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2015-06-05

4.  Preventable Adverse Events in Surgical Care in Sweden: A Nationwide Review of Patient Notes.

Authors:  Lena Nilsson; Madeleine Borgstedt Risberg; Agneta Montgomery; Rune Sjödahl; Kristina Schildmeijer; Hans Rutberg
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Pediatric surgical errors: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Katherine M Marsh; Mark A Fleming; Florence E Turrentine; Daniel E Levin; Jeffrey W Gander; Jessica Keim-Malpass; R Scott Jones
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.545

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.