Literature DB >> 21877789

Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.

Matthew M McCormick1, Ernest L Madsen, Meagan E Deaner, Tomy Varghese.   

Abstract

Absolute backscatter coefficients in tissue-mimicking phantoms were experimentally determined in the 5-50 MHz frequency range using a broadband technique. A focused broadband transducer from a commercial research system, the VisualSonics Vevo 770, was used with two tissue-mimicking phantoms. The phantoms differed regarding the thin layers covering their surfaces to prevent desiccation and regarding glass bead concentrations and diameter distributions. Ultrasound scanning of these phantoms was performed through the thin layer. To avoid signal saturation, the power spectra obtained from the backscattered radio frequency signals were calibrated by using the signal from a liquid planar reflector, a water-brominated hydrocarbon interface with acoustic impedance close to that of water. Experimental values of absolute backscatter coefficients were compared with those predicted by the Faran scattering model over the frequency range 5-50 MHz. The mean percent difference and standard deviation was 54% ± 45% for the phantom with a mean glass bead diameter of 5.40 μm and was 47% ± 28% for the phantom with 5.16 μm mean diameter beads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21877789      PMCID: PMC3190655          DOI: 10.1121/1.3605669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements.

Authors:  E L Madsen; F Dong; G R Frank; B S Garra; K A Wear; T Wilson; J A Zagzebski; H L Miller; K K Shung; S H Wang; E J Feleppa; T Liu; W D O'Brien; K A Topp; N T Sanghvi; A V Zaitsev; T J Hall; J B Fowlkes; O D Kripfgans; J G Miller
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Low-reflection-coefficient liquid interfaces for system characterization.

Authors:  T J Hall; E L Madsen; F Dong; I R Medina; G R Frank
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  High-frequency ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficients of in vivo normal human dermis and subcutaneous fat.

Authors:  B I Raju; M A Srinivasan
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 4.  A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Martin O Culjat; David Goldenberg; Priyamvada Tewari; Rahul S Singh
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.

Authors:  M P Brewin; L C Pike; D E Rowland; M J Birch
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Tests of backscatter coefficient measurement using broadband pulses.

Authors:  J F Chen; J A Zagzebski; E L Madsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Backscatter coefficient measurements using a reference phantom to extract depth-dependent instrumentation factors.

Authors:  L X Yao; J A Zagzebski; E L Madsen
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  Method of data reduction for accurate determination of acoustic backscatter coefficients.

Authors:  E L Madsen; M F Insana; J A Zagzebski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Anechoic sphere phantoms for estimating 3-D resolution of very-high-frequency ultrasound scanners.

Authors:  Ernest Madsen; Gary Frank; Matthew McCormick; Meagan Deaner; Timothy Stiles
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Group velocity, phase velocity, and dispersion in human calcaneus in vivo.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  5 in total

1.  Platform for quantitative multiscale imaging of tissue composition.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Zachary J Simmons; Ryan C Niemeier; Bing Dai; Lauren B Woods; Timothy J Hall; Paul J Campagnola; Jeremy D Rogers; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Estimating cell concentration in three-dimensional engineered tissues using high frequency quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  Karla P Mercado; María Helguera; Denise C Hocking; Diane Dalecki
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; Jonathan Mamou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Main Uncertainties in the RF Ultrasound Scanning Simulation of the Standard Ultrasound Phantoms.

Authors:  Monika Makūnaitė; Rytis Jurkonis; Arūnas Lukoševičius; Mindaugas Baranauskas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Challenges of conducting quantitative ultrasound with a multimodal optical imaging system.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Timothy J Hall; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.609

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.