Literature DB >> 21877218

[Pericardial effusion. Differential diagnostics, surveillance and treatment].

S Lehmann1, T Schröter, S Thomas, A Lehmann, I Altmann, S Leontyev, S Leotyev, F Bakhtiary, J Seeburger, J Garbade, A Rastan, F W Mohr.   

Abstract

Cardiac tamponade can be a life-threatening condition due to the high variability of clinical symptoms and the associated risk of rapid hemodynamic deterioration. Therefore, accurate diagnosis followed by immediate intervention is necessary. Common clinical features of cardiac tamponade are pulsus paradoxus, tachycardia, elevated jugular venous pressure and hypotension; however, although these can be indicative of cardiac tamponade they are non-specific. Instant confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of cardiac tamponade can be pursued with echocardiography which also enables a clear estimation of the current hemodynamic situation. Thus in contemporary clinical practice echocardiography plays a key role in the management of cardiac tamponade and must be consulted with regards to final treatment decisions. Common practice includes pericardial puncture under echocardiographic and/or X-ray guidance but only in cases of significantly sized pericardial effusions. Whenever there is a limited sized but hemodynamically significant effusion, inferior pericardiotomy should be the preferred treatment strategy. In cases of cardiac tamponade following chest trauma a full median sternotomy can be a suitable approach for surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21877218     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-011-2154-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  5 in total

1.  Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases executive summary; The Task force on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European society of cardiology.

Authors:  Bernhard Maisch; Petar M Seferović; Arsen D Ristić; Raimund Erbel; Reiner Rienmüller; Yehuda Adler; Witold Z Tomkowski; Gaetano Thiene; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Management of pericardial effusion the role of echocardiography in establishing the indications and the selection of the approach for drainage.

Authors:  Arsen D Ristic; Petar M Seferovic; Bernhard Maisch
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Diagnostic value of pericardial biopsy: improvement with extensive sampling enabled by pericardioscopy.

Authors:  Petar M Seferović; Arsen D Ristić; Ruzica Maksimović; Vujadin Tatić; Miodrag Ostojić; Vladimir Kanjuh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Diagnostic value of chest radiography for pericardial effusion.

Authors:  M J Eisenberg; M M Dunn; N Kanth; G Gamsu; N B Schiller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Comparison of open subxiphoid pericardial drainage with percutaneous catheter drainage for symptomatic pericardial effusion.

Authors:  Jerome M McDonald; Bryan F Meyers; Tracey J Guthrie; Richard J Battafarano; Joel D Cooper; G Alexander Patterson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.330

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Perforation of myocardial wall and great vessels after cardiovascular interventions-a 5-year analysis.

Authors:  Zdenek Provaznik; Andreas Holzamer; Daniele Camboni; Leopold Rupprecht; Markus Resch; Sigrid Wittmann; Christof Schmid; Bernhard Floerchinger
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.