Literature DB >> 21876550

Quality of life and urological morbidity in tetraplegics with artificial ventilation managed with suprapubic or intermittent catheterisation.

R Böthig1, S Hirschfeld, R Thietje.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Mono-centric, retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: Analysis of correlation between bladder management and age in respirator-dependant high-tetraplegic patients. Additionally suprapubic catheter (SPC) and intermittent catheterisation (IC) were reviewed concerning urological complications and quality of life (QoL).
SETTING: Level 1 trauma centre.
METHODS: A QoL questionnaire 'International Consultation on Incontinence' (ICIQ-SF) was sent to 56 tetraplegic respirator device-dependant (RDD)-spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Their scores concerning urological morbidity were reviewed. For analysis reasons they were divided in three groups: SPC, IC and others.
RESULTS: SPC 38, IC 12 and others 6 patients. Significant difference in age (SPC vs IC=49.9 vs 31.8 years) was observed but no disparity in gender. Within a follow-up period 2-26 years (median 8 years) significant urological complications in patients with IC (P<0.05) were ascertained. These were in general minor complications. Especially renal deterioration or bladder cancer was not diagnosed in any of the group. The questionnaire return rate was high (83.9%) with complete answers (SPC=32, IC=11). Self assessment of QoL with ICIQ-SF revealed no significant difference for both groups on low level, but SPC patients tend to score better.
CONCLUSION: In our study, tetraplegic RDD-SCI patients with SPC suffered less urological complications and tend to score a better QoL. Therefore we recommend SPC as a serious alternative for these selected patients and concurrently underline the necessity of close urological surveillance at least annually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21876550     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2011.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  6 in total

1.  Experience of a tertiary referral center in managing bladder cancer in conjunction with neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Gianluca Sampogna; Matteo Maltagliati; Antonio Galfano; Aldo Bocciardi; Bernardo Rocco; Salvatore Micali; Emanuele Montanari; Michele Spinelli
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 2.  Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for neurogenic bladder function after spinal cord injury: A systematic review.

Authors:  Krista L Best; Karen Ethans; B Catharine Craven; Luc Noreau; Sander L Hitzig
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Who decides? A qualitative study on the decisional roles of patients, their caregivers and doctors on the method of bladder drainage after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  J P Engkasan; C J Ng; W Y Low
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Bladder management in individuals with chronic neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  J Krebs; J Wöllner; J Pannek
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Bladder Management Difficulties and Bowel Management Difficulties item banks and short forms and the SCI-QOL Bladder Complications scale.

Authors:  David S Tulsky; Pamela A Kisala; Denise G Tate; Ann M Spungen; Steven C Kirshblum
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  [Quality of life for wearers of a suprapubic or transurethral bladder catheter as lifelong permanent care].

Authors:  A Wiedemann; C Gedding; M Heese; J Stein; A Manseck; R Kirschner-Hermanns; H Karstedt; A Schorn; A Wagner; V Moll; U Unger; A Eisenhardt; A Bannowsky; C Linné; S Wirz; E Brammen; H-J Heppner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 0.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.