Literature DB >> 21875909

Delayed postconditioning in the mouse heart in vivo.

François Roubille1, Alicia Franck-Miclo, Aurélie Covinhes, Chrystel Lafont, Frédéric Cransac, Stéphane Combes, Anne Vincent, Pierre Fontanaud, Catherine Sportouch-Dukhan, Christelle Redt-Clouet, Joël Nargeot, Christophe Piot, Stéphanie Barrère-Lemaire.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion during acute myocardial infarction remains the best treatment for reducing infarct size. Postconditioning, applied at the onset of reperfusion, reduces myocardial infarction both in animals and humans. The objective of this study was to identify the time delay to apply postconditioning at reperfusion, allowing preservation of cardioprotection in the mouse myocardium. This is a major issue in the management of acute myocardial infarction patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Mice were subjected to 40 minutes of ischemia and 60 minutes of reperfusion (IR(60')). Postconditioning protocols corresponding to repetitive ischemia (3 cycles of 1 minute of ischemia and 1 minute of reperfusion) were applied during early reperfusion at various time durations (Δt) after reopening of the coronary artery (Δt=10 seconds, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 minutes; PostC(Δt)). Infarct size/area at risk was reduced by 71% in PostC(Δ1) compared with IR(60') mice (P=5×10(-6)). There was a linear correlation (r(2)=0.91) between infarct size and Δt, indicating that the cardioprotective effect of delayed postconditioning was progressively attenuated when Δt time increased. The protective effect of PostC(Δ1) and PostC(Δ15) was still effective when the duration of reperfusion was prolonged to 24 hours (IR(24 hours); PostC(Δ1) and PostC(Δ15) versus IR(24 hours), P=0.001). Similar results were obtained for internucleosomal DNA fragmentation and lactate dehydrogenase release.
CONCLUSIONS: This study in our in vivo mouse model of myocardial IR shows for the first time that delaying the intervention of postconditioning to 30 minutes does not abrogate the cardioprotective effect of postconditioning. This finding provides evidence that the time window of protection afforded by postconditioning may be larger than initially reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21875909     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.031864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  20 in total

1.  Cellular postconditioning: allogeneic cardiosphere-derived cells reduce infarct size and attenuate microvascular obstruction when administered after reperfusion in pigs with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Hideaki Kanazawa; Eleni Tseliou; Konstantinos Malliaras; Kristine Yee; James F Dawkins; Geoffrey De Couto; Rachel R Smith; Michelle Kreke; Jeffrey Seinfeld; Ryan C Middleton; Romain Gallet; Ke Cheng; Daniel Luthringer; Ileana Valle; Supurna Chowdhury; Keiichi Fukuda; Raj R Makkar; Linda Marbán; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Myeloid-derived growth factor (C19orf10) mediates cardiac repair following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mortimer Korf-Klingebiel; Marc R Reboll; Stefanie Klede; Torben Brod; Andreas Pich; Felix Polten; L Christian Napp; Johann Bauersachs; Arnold Ganser; Eva Brinkmann; Ines Reimann; Tibor Kempf; Hans W Niessen; Jacques Mizrahi; Hans-Joachim Schönfeld; Antonio Iglesias; Maria Bobadilla; Yong Wang; Kai C Wollert
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Protection of the ischemic myocardium during the reperfusion: between hope and reality.

Authors:  Jean Chrisostome Bopassa
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-07-25

4.  Cardiac progenitor-derived exosomes protect ischemic myocardium from acute ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Lijuan Chen; Yingjie Wang; Yaohua Pan; Lan Zhang; Chengxing Shen; Gangjian Qin; Muhammad Ashraf; Neal Weintraub; Genshan Ma; Yaoliang Tang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a neglected therapeutic target.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Postconditioning signalling in the heart: mechanisms and translatability.

Authors:  Justin S Bice; Gary F Baxter
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Remote ischaemic pre- and delayed postconditioning - similar degree of cardioprotection but distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Marina Basalay; Veronika Barsukevich; Svetlana Mastitskaya; Alexander Mrochek; John Pernow; Per-Ove Sjöquist; Gareth L Ackland; Alexander V Gourine; Andrey Gourine
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.969

8.  Impact of multiple balloon inflations during primary percutaneous coronary intervention on infarct size and long-term clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: real-world postconditioning.

Authors:  Tuncay Yetgin; Michael Magro; Olivier C Manintveld; Sjoerd T Nauta; Jin M Cheng; Corstiaan A den Uil; Cihan Simsek; Ferry Hersbach; Ron T van Domburg; Eric Boersma; Patrick W Serruys; Dirk J Duncker; Robert-Jan M van Geuns; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 17.165

9.  Distinct cardioprotective mechanisms of immediate, early and delayed ischaemic postconditioning.

Authors:  Veronika Barsukevich; Marina Basalay; Jenifer Sanchez; Alexander Mrochek; John Whittle; Gareth L Ackland; Alexander V Gourine; Andrey Gourine
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 17.165

Review 10.  The potential of stem cells in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Aurora Bernal; Beatriz G Gálvez
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.