Literature DB >> 21875853

Noninvasive evaluation of coronary distensibility in older adults: a feasibility study with MR angiography.

Kai Lin1, Donald M Lloyd-Jones, Ying Liu, Xiaoming Bi, Debiao Li, James C Carr.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of using magnetic resonance (MR) angiography to noninvasively measure the coronary distensibility index (CDI) in older adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board and was compliant with HIPAA. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Three-dimensional MR angiography was performed in 23 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) (mean age, 72.9 years ± 5.8 [standard deviation]; age range, 65-84 years; 12 men, 11 women) and 50 healthy aging control subjects (mean age, 73.1 years ± 5.6; age range, 64-84 years; 28 men, 22 women). Imaging data were acquired in the rest periods of cardiac motion identified during end systole and middiastole. For imaging data with different acquisition windows, cross-sectional coronary planes were reconstructed and matched for the same anatomy according to coronary landmarks. The CDI, defined as [(lumen area at systole--lumen area at diastole)/(lumen area at diastole × pulse pressure)] × 1000, was compared between patients with DM and control subjects by using the Student t test. With the same protocol, CDIs were calculated in 10 randomly selected subjects by two independent readers. In addition, MR angiography (in systole and diastole) was repeated in those 10 subjects after repositioning.
RESULTS: CDIs were measured in 43 coronary segments of patients with DM and in 124 coronary segments of control subjects. The mean CDI in patients with DM was significantly lower than that in control subjects (2.79 mm Hg(-1) ± 2.12 vs 9.14 mm Hg(-1) ± 5.87, respectively; P < .001). CDI measurements showed good intraobserver (r = 0.914), interobserver (r = 0.820), and imaging-repeat imaging agreements (r = 0.811).
CONCLUSION: Coronary MR angiography is a reproducible and repeatable noninvasive method for detecting significant differences in coronary distensibility between patients with DM and healthy aging control subjects. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21875853      PMCID: PMC3219916          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Arterial stiffness and endothelial function in patients with beta-thalassemia major.

Authors:  Y F Cheung; Godfrey C F Chan; S Y Ha
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Estimation of pressure pulse amplification between aorta and brachial artery using stepwise multiple regression models.

Authors:  F Camacho; A Avolio; N H Lovell
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 3.  Arterial aging: is it an immutable cardiovascular risk factor?

Authors:  Samer S Najjar; Angelo Scuteri; Edward G Lakatta
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography.

Authors:  Y Wang; E Vidan; G W Bergman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Dynamic expansion of the coronary arteries: implications for intravascular ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  N J Weissman; I F Palacios; A E Weyman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Coronary artery distensibility in diabetic patients with simultaneous measurements of luminal area and intracoronary pressure: evidence of impaired reactivity to nitroglycerin.

Authors:  M Vavuranakis; C Stefanadis; E Triandaphyllidi; K Toutouzas; P Toutouzas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary vasodilation using magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Masahiro Terashima; Craig H Meyer; Brian G Keeffe; Eric J Putz; Erasmo de la Pena-Almaguer; Phillip C Yang; Bob S Hu; Dwight G Nishimura; Michael V McConnell
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in vivo.

Authors:  J Ge; R Erbel; T Gerber; G Görge; L Koch; M Haude; J Meyer
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-06

Review 9.  Coronary artery imaging by magnetic resonance.

Authors:  M B Scheidegger; M Stuber; P Boesiger; O M Hess
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Maximal coronary flow reserve and metabolic coronary vasodilation in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  P J Nahser; R E Brown; H Oskarsson; M D Winniford; J D Rossen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of the coronary vasculature: imaging the lumen, wall, and beyond.

Authors:  Kai Lin; James C Carr
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Potential quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of coronary remodeling in older hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ying Liu; Xiaoming Bi; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  The compensation for asynchronous cardiac quiescence in coronary wall MR imaging.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ying Liu; Biao Lu; Huadan Xue; Yining Wang; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  The detection of coronary stiffness in cardiac allografts using MR imaging.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Kirsi Taimen; Ying Liu; Xiaoming Bi; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  The role of latency period in quality management for free-breathing coronary wall MRI.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ying Liu; Xiaoming Bi; Biao Lu; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Effects of respiratory motion on coronary wall MR imaging: a quantitative study of older adults.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Xiaoming Bi; Ying Liu; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  The relationship between coronary artery distensibility and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Andy S C Yong; Ashkan Javadzadegan; William F Fearon; Abouzar Moshfegh; Jerrett K Lau; Stephen Nicholls; Martin K C Ng; Leonard Kritharides
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Upper extremity composite tissue allotransplantation imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth George; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Kanako K Kumamaru; Nehal Shah; Stacy E Smith; Kurt Schultz; Pamela M Deaver; Katherine M Mullen; Michael L Steigner; Edwin C Gravereaux; Shadpour Demehri; Ericka M Bueno; Simon G Talbot; Bohdan Pomahac; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-07-16

9.  Coronary artery size and origin imaging in children: a comparative study of MRI and trans-thoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Tarique Hussain; Sujeev Mathur; Sarah A Peel; Israel Valverde; Karolina Bilska; Markus Henningsson; Rene M Botnar; John Simpson; Gerald F Greil
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 1.930

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.