PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe sexual well-being among non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors. DESIGN: Descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study. SETTING: NHL survivors identified via the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program. SAMPLE: 222 NHL survivors two- to five-years postdiagnosis. METHODS: Data were collected via mailed questionnaire. Multivariate models were used to examine sexual well-being. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Three indices of sexual well-being were examined in relation to sociodemographic and medical variables: participation in sexual activity, satisfaction with sex life, and sexual function. FINDINGS: Most NHL survivors were participating in sexual activity; however, more than half were dissatisfied with their sex life. A substantial minority "usually or always" experienced problems with sexual function. Associations between study variables and outcomes differed across indices of sexual well-being and by gender; older age was associated with decreased participation, decreased satisfaction, and impaired sexual function for men as well as with decreased participation for women. Poorer physical functioning was associated with decreased participation for men and women as well as poorer sexual function for women. Finally, poorer mental functioning was associated with less satisfaction and poorer sexual function for men and women; shorter times since diagnosis were associated with poorer sexual function for women. CONCLUSIONS: Most NHL survivors were sexually active, but many reported difficulties with satisfaction and function. Sexual well-being is a multifaceted construct that requires continued attention throughout survivorship. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses are in an excellent position to ensure that survivors' sexual concerns are addressed. Survivorship care plans may help to facilitate communication about survivors' sexual well-being.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe sexual well-being among non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors. DESIGN: Descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study. SETTING: NHL survivors identified via the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program. SAMPLE: 222 NHL survivors two- to five-years postdiagnosis. METHODS: Data were collected via mailed questionnaire. Multivariate models were used to examine sexual well-being. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Three indices of sexual well-being were examined in relation to sociodemographic and medical variables: participation in sexual activity, satisfaction with sex life, and sexual function. FINDINGS: Most NHL survivors were participating in sexual activity; however, more than half were dissatisfied with their sex life. A substantial minority "usually or always" experienced problems with sexual function. Associations between study variables and outcomes differed across indices of sexual well-being and by gender; older age was associated with decreased participation, decreased satisfaction, and impaired sexual function for men as well as with decreased participation for women. Poorer physical functioning was associated with decreased participation for men and women as well as poorer sexual function for women. Finally, poorer mental functioning was associated with less satisfaction and poorer sexual function for men and women; shorter times since diagnosis were associated with poorer sexual function for women. CONCLUSIONS: Most NHL survivors were sexually active, but many reported difficulties with satisfaction and function. Sexual well-being is a multifaceted construct that requires continued attention throughout survivorship. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses are in an excellent position to ensure that survivors' sexual concerns are addressed. Survivorship care plans may help to facilitate communication about survivors' sexual well-being.
Authors: Jackelyn B Payne; Kaylin V Dance; Monique Farone; Anh Phan; Cathy D Ho; Meghan Gutierrez; Lillian Chen; Christopher R Flowers Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Maria Olsson; Gunnar Steineck; Karin Enskär; Ulrica Wilderäng; Marianne Jarfelt Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Neeraj K Arora; Roxanne E Jensen; Nadiyah Sulayman; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Corien Eeltink; Alaa Embaby; Luca Incrocci; Johannes C F Ket; Sarah J Liptrott; Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw; Sonja Zweegman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Christine J Kurian; Amy E Leader; Melissa S Y Thong; Scott W Keith; Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 3.295