Literature DB >> 21875224

Expectation to receive methylphenidate enhances subjective arousal but not cognitive performance.

Alison Looby1, Mitch Earleywine.   

Abstract

Nonmedical use of prescription-stimulant medication such as methylphenidate (MPH) has increased among college students over the past several years. Common motivations for use include enhancements in cognition and subjective arousal. As it is unclear whether stimulant medication exerts the same effect on healthy individuals as for those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, it is possible that many reported effects of prescription stimulants by healthy individuals may stem from placebo effects, which may be an important mechanism underlying initiation and maintenance of nonmedical use. This study examined whether placebo effects influence reports of subjective mood and cognitive performance among college students who endorsed several risk factors for prescription-stimulant misuse (i.e., low grade point average, fraternity/sorority involvement, binge drinking, cannabis use). Ninety-six subjects (60% male) completed cognitive tests and questionnaires assessing present mood state on two occasions. Forty-seven participants were randomized to an experimental condition and orally ingested what they believed to be MPH, though actually placebo, on one visit and received no medication on the other visit. The control group received no medication on either visit. During the administration visit, experimental participants reported feeling significantly more high and stimulated compared with the nonadministration visit and to the control subjects. However, cognitive enhancement differences were not generally seen between visits or groups. This research demonstrates that placebo effects for prescription stimulants do influence subjective mood and may be implicated in nonmedical stimulant use. This knowledge may be useful in challenging prescription-stimulant-related expectancies to decrease the prevalence of use among college students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21875224      PMCID: PMC3590067          DOI: 10.1037/a0025252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  34 in total

1.  Nonmedical prescription stimulant use among college students: why we need to do something and what we need to do.

Authors:  Amelia M Arria; Robert L DuPont
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  2010-10

2.  Comparison of the behavioral and cardiovascular effects of intranasal and oral d-amphetamine in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Joshua A Lile; Shanna Babalonis; Cleeve Emurian; Catherine A Martin; Daniel P Wermeling; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  Persistent nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among college students: possible association with ADHD symptoms.

Authors:  Amelia M Arria; Laura M Garnier-Dykstra; Kimberly M Caldeira; Kathryn B Vincent; Kevin E O'Grady; Eric D Wish
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.256

Review 4.  What are the cognitive effects of stimulant medications? Emphasis on adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Claire Advokat
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man.

Authors:  W R Martin; J W Sloan; J D Sapira; D R Jasinski
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1971 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Expectancy challenge and drinking reduction: experimental evidence for a mediational process.

Authors:  J Darkes; M S Goldman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1993-04

7.  Cognitive effects of milacemide and methylphenidate in healthy young adults.

Authors:  J A Camp-Bruno; R L Herting
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder across the life cycle.

Authors:  T Spencer; J Biederman; T Wilens; M Harding; D O'Donnell; S Griffin
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 8.829

9.  Increased methylphenidate usage for attention deficit disorder in the 1990s.

Authors:  D J Safer; J M Zito; E M Fine
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Predictors of nonmedical ADHD medication use by college students.

Authors:  David L Rabiner; Arthur D Anastopoulos; E Jane Costello; Rick H Hoyle; H Scott Swartzwelder
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.256

View more
  17 in total

1.  Quantifying the Difference between Active and Passive Control Groups in Cognitive Interventions Using two Meta-Analytical Approaches.

Authors:  Jacky Au; Benjamin C Gibson; Kimberly Bunarjo; Martin Buschkuehl; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2020-01-29

2.  Unpacking placebo and working memory training effects on cognitive performance.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Heejung Jung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Methylphenidate Modulates Functional Network Connectivity to Enhance Attention.

Authors:  Monica D Rosenberg; Sheng Zhang; Wei-Ting Hsu; Dustin Scheinost; Emily S Finn; Xilin Shen; R Todd Constable; Chiang-Shan R Li; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Do college students improve their grades by using prescription stimulants nonmedically?

Authors:  Amelia M Arria; Kimberly M Caldeira; Kathryn B Vincent; Kevin E O'Grady; M Dolores Cimini; Irene M Geisner; Nicole Fossos-Wong; Jason R Kilmer; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 5.  Efficacy of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in non-attention deficit hyperactivity disorder youth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kara Simone Bagot; Yifrah Kaminer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Challenging expectancies to prevent nonmedical prescription stimulant use: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Alison Looby; Kyle P De Young; Mitch Earleywine
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Predicting college student prescription stimulant misuse: An analysis from ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Ty S Schepis; Julia D Buckner; Dalton L Klare; Lauren R Wade; Natalie Benedetto
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Nonmedical Use of Prescription Stimulants Among US High School Students to Help Study: Results From a National Survey.

Authors:  Christian J Teter; Christopher G DiRaimo; Brady T West; Ty S Schepis; Sean Esteban McCabe
Journal:  J Pharm Pract       Date:  2018-07-02

9.  Prescription stimulants in individuals with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: misuse, cognitive impact, and adverse effects.

Authors:  Shaheen E Lakhan; Annette Kirchgessner
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults with sleep apnea.

Authors:  Ömer Oğuztürk; Mehmet Ekici; Dilay Çimen; Aydanur Ekici; Erol Senturk
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.