Literature DB >> 21875192

Development of the Brief Romantic Relationship Interaction Coding Scheme (BRRICS).

Mikhila N Humbad1, M Brent Donnellan, Kelly L Klump, S Alexandra Burt.   

Abstract

Although observational studies of romantic relationships are common, many existing coding schemes require considerable amounts of time and resources to implement. The current study presents a new coding scheme, the Brief Romantic Relationship Interaction Coding Scheme (BRRICS), designed to assess various aspects of romantic relationship both quickly and efficiently. The BRRICS consists of four individual coding dimensions assessing positive and negative affect in each member of the dyad, as well as four codes assessing specific components of the dyadic interaction (i.e., positive reciprocity, demand-withdraw pattern, negative reciprocity, and overall satisfaction). Concurrent associations with measures of marital adjustment and conflict were evaluated in a sample of 118 married couples participating in the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Couples were asked to discuss common conflicts in their marriage while being videotaped. Undergraduate coders used the BRRICS to rate these interactions. The BRRICS scales were correlated in expected directions with self-reports of marital adjustment, as well as children's perception of the severity and frequency of marital conflict. Based on these results, the BRRICS may be an efficient tool for researchers with large samples of observational data who are interested in coding global aspects of the relationship but do not have the resources to use labor intensive schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21875192      PMCID: PMC3339624          DOI: 10.1037/a0025216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  19 in total

Review 1.  Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.

Authors:  R E Heyman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-03

2.  How does personality matter in marriage? An examination of trait anxiety, interpersonal negativity, and marital satisfaction.

Authors:  J P Caughlin; T L Huston; R M Houts
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-02

3.  Hostile marital interactions, proinflammatory cytokine production, and wound healing.

Authors:  Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser; Timothy J Loving; Jeffrey R Stowell; William B Malarkey; Stanley Lemeshow; Stephanie L Dickinson; Ronald Glaser
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-12

4.  The Michigan State University Twin Registry (MSUTR): genetic, environmental and neurobiological influences on behavior across development.

Authors:  Kelly L Klump; S Alexandra Burt
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.587

5.  Marital interactions of depressed men and women.

Authors:  S L Johnson; T Jacob
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-02

6.  Externalizing psychopathology and marital adjustment in long-term marriages: results from a large combined sample of married couples.

Authors:  Mikhila N Humbad; M Brent Donnellan; William G Iacono; S Alexandra Burt
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2010-02

7.  Hostility, hostile detachment, and conflict engagement in marriages: effects on child and family functioning.

Authors:  Lynn Fainsilber Katz; Erica M Woodin
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

8.  Assessing marital conflict from the child's perspective: the children's perception of interparental conflict scale.

Authors:  J H Grych; M Seid; F D Fincham
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1992-06

9.  Hostility, anger, and marital adjustment: concurrent and prospective associations with psychosocial vulnerability.

Authors:  Kelly Glazer Baron; Timothy W Smith; Jonathan Butner; Jill Nealey-Moore; Melissa W Hawkins; Bert N Uchino
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-12-13

10.  Factor structure of the Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale for studies of youths with externalizing behavior problems.

Authors:  Joel T Nigg; Molly Nikolas; Torri Miller; S Alexandra Burt; Kelly L Klump; Alexander von Eye
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2009-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  The quality of the interparental relationship does not moderate the etiology of child conduct problems.

Authors:  S A Burt; M N Wildey; K L Klump
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  Using Multiple Methods to Evaluate Associations Among Externalizing Psychopathology, Personality, and Relationship Quality: A Replication and Extension.

Authors:  Mikhila N Wildey; M Brent Donnellan; Kelly L Klump; S Alexandra Burt
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2019-08-12

3.  Making the Case for Joint Decision-Making in Future Multipurpose Prevention Technology (MPT) Choice: Qualitative Findings on MPT Attribute Preferences from the CUPID Study (MTN-045).

Authors:  Nivedita L Bhushan; Petina Musara; Miriam Hartmann; Marie C D Stoner; Shweta R Shah; Josephine Nabukeera; Ivan Rukundo; Prisca Mutero; Megan A Lewis; Jeanna Piper; Mary Kate Shapley-Quinn; Juliane Etima; Alexandra M Minnis
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 6.707

4.  The Michigan State University Twin Registry (MSUTR): an update.

Authors:  S Alexandra Burt; Kelly L Klump
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 1.587

5.  The lump-versus-split dilemma in couple observational coding: A multisite analysis of rapid marital interaction coding system data.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Amy K Otto; Maija Reblin; Alexandra K Wojda; Shu Xu
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2020-11-12

6.  Loneliness in Intimate Relationships Scale (LIRS): Development and Validation.

Authors:  Ami Rokach; Ami Sha'ked; Elisheva Ben-Artzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.