Literature DB >> 21874079

ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL INEQUALITY: HOW THE CONCLUSIONS WE DRAW VARY ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITIONS WE EMPLOY.

Liam Downey1.   

Abstract

This article demonstrates that the conclusions environmental inequality researchers draw vary according to the definitions of environmental inequality they employ and that researchers can use a single set of results to test for the existence of multiple forms of environmental inequality. In order to illustrate these points, I set forth five definitions of environmental inequality, list the kinds of evidence we must obtain in order to determine whether each form of environmental inequality exists, and show how conclusions drawn from several recent environmental inequality studies vary depending on the definition of environmental inequality we employ. My goal is not to show that any one definition is superior to the others; nor am I trying to generalize from the studies reported here to a broader set of research findings. Instead, my goal is to a) show that we can use a single set of results to address a variety of environmental justice concerns and b) demonstrate that our interpretations of environmental inequality research have been too narrowly focused on one set of environmental inequality outcomes.

Year:  2005        PMID: 21874079      PMCID: PMC3162366          DOI: 10.1080/027321790518870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Spectr        ISSN: 0273-2173


  6 in total

1.  An analytical review of environmental justice research: what do we really know?

Authors:  William Bowen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  The Unintended Significance of Race: Environmental Racial Inequality in Detroit.

Authors:  Liam Downey
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2005-03

3.  Environmental stressors: the mental health impacts of living near industrial activity.

Authors:  Liam Downey; Marieke Van Willigen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2005-09

4.  Medical care and mortality: racial differences in preventable deaths.

Authors:  S Woolhandler; D U Himmelstein; R Silber; M Bader; M Harnly; A A Jones
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.663

5.  Access to medical care for black and white Americans. A matter of continuing concern.

Authors:  R J Blendon; L H Aiken; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Environmental equity: the demographics of dumping.

Authors:  D L Anderton; A B Anderson; J M Oakes; M R Fraser
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1994-05
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  ENVIRONMENTAL INEQUALITY IN METROPOLITAN AMERICA IN 2000.

Authors:  Liam Downey
Journal:  Sociol Spectr       Date:  2006

2.  Childhood Development and Access to Nature: A New Direction for Environmental Inequality Research.

Authors:  Susan Strife; Liam Downey
Journal:  Organ Environ       Date:  2009-03

3.  Leave no one behind: A case of ecosystem service supply equity in Singapore.

Authors:  Andrea Law; L Roman Carrasco; Daniel R Richards; Shaikh Fairul Edros Ahmad Shaikh; Claudia L Y Tan; Le Thi Phuong Nghiem
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.943

4.  RACE, INCOME, AND ENVIRONMENTAL INEQUALITY IN THE UNITED STATES.

Authors:  Liam Downey; Brian Hawkins
Journal:  Sociol Perspect       Date:  2008-12-01

5.  Demonstration of a Low-Cost Multi-Pollutant Network to Quantify Intra-Urban Spatial Variations in Air Pollutant Source Impacts and to Evaluate Environmental Justice.

Authors:  Rebecca Tanzer; Carl Malings; Aliaksei Hauryliuk; R Subramanian; Albert A Presto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Superfund: evaluating the impact of executive order 12898.

Authors:  Sandra George O'Neil
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  A Novel Environmental Justice Indicator for Managing Local Air Pollution.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Laura Gladson; Kevin Cromar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.