Literature DB >> 21873962

A current update on the evolution of robotic liver surgery.

K Kitisin1, V Packiam, D L Bartlett, A Tsung.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic liver surgery has evolved significantly over the past decade. Increasing understanding of hepatic anatomy and advancements in technology have extended the scope of the minimally invasive approach. Robotic-assisted technology offers solutions to the fundamental limitations of conventional laparoscopic liver resection. Several centers have begun to utilize robotic technology to perform complex liver surgeries. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of published literature about the role of robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology in liver surgery. A literature search of Pubmed was used to identify all English publications about robotic liver surgery. Publications were selected to examine all unique patient series. Outcomes analyzed included operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, complication rate, conversion rate to open, cost, and oncologic outcomes. A total of eight series containing 134 unique patients were selected for review. Sixty-nine percent of patients had malignant lesions resected, while 31% had benign lesions. Segmentectomy/wedge (36%) was the most common resection performed, followed by left lateral sectionectomy (28%) right hepatectomy (16%) and left hepatectomy (9%). A meta-analysis of the remaining data was not possible due to heterogeneity in methods for reporting. Outcomes varied widely between studies. Based on analysis of early published series, robotic liver surgery is a feasible and safe tool for the minimally invasive resection of hepatic lesions. Further evaluation is required to assess for improvement in outcomes, and long-term oncologic outcomes are still pending.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21873962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Chir        ISSN: 0026-4733            Impact factor:   1.000


  14 in total

Review 1.  Adopting Gayet's Techniques of Totally Laparoscopic Liver Surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 11.740

2.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kimberly M Brown; Abhishek D Parmar; David A Geller
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.495

3.  Minimally invasive liver resection: robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy.

Authors:  Vignesh Packiam; David L Bartlett; Samer Tohme; Srinevas Reddy; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller; Allan Tsung
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: pure laparoscopic approach versus hand-assisted technique.

Authors:  J S Cardinal; S K Reddy; A Tsung; J W Marsh; D A Geller
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.027

5.  Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.

Authors:  Roberto Montalti; Vincenzo Scuderi; Alberto Patriti; Marco Vivarelli; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors.

Authors:  Iswanto Sucandy; Sydni Schlosser; Timothy Bourdeau; Janelle Spence; Abdelrahman Attili; Sharona Ross; Alexander Rosemurgy
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-02-23

Review 7.  Laparoscopic versus Robotic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Taslim Aboudou; Meixuan Li; Zeliang Zhang; Zhengfeng Wang; Yanfei Li; Lufang Feng; Xiajing Chu; Nan Chen; Wence Zhou; Kehu Yang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Montalti; Giammauro Berardi; Alberto Patriti; Marco Vivarelli; Roberto Ivan Troisi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Robotic hepatectomy: initial experience of a single institution in Singapore.

Authors:  Juinn Huar Kam; Brian Kp Goh; Chung-Yip Chan; Jen-San Wong; Ser-Yee Lee; Peng-Chung Cheow; Alexander Y F Chung; London L P J Ooi
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 10.  Systematic review of robotic liver resection.

Authors:  Cheng-Maw Ho; Go Wakabayashi; Hiroyuki Nitta; Naoko Ito; Yasushi Hasegawa; Takeshi Takahara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.