Literature DB >> 21873898

A subsequent movement alters lower extremity muscle activity and kinetics in drop jumps vs. drop landings.

Jatin P Ambegaonkar1, Sandra J Shultz, David H Perrin.   

Abstract

Drop landings and drop jumps are common training exercises and injury research model tasks. Drop landings have a single landing, whereas drop jumps include a subsequent jump after initial landing. With the expected ground impact, instant and landing surface suggested to modulate landing neuromechanics, muscle activity, and kinetics should be the same in both tasks when landing from the same height onto the same surface. Although previous researchers have noted some differences between these tasks across separate studies, little research has compared these tasks in the same study. Thus, we examined whether a subsequent movement after initial landing alters muscle activity and kinetics between drop landings and jumps. Fifteen women performed 10 drop landings and drop jumps each from 45 cm. Muscle onsets and integrated muscle activation amplitudes 150 milliseconds before (preactivity) and after landing (postactivity) in the medial and lateral quadriceps, hamstrings, and lateral gastrocnemius and peak and time-to-peak vertical ground reaction forces were examined across tasks (p ≤ 0.05). When performing drop jumps, subjects demonstrated later (p = 0.02) gastrocnemius and lesser lateral gastrocnemius (p = 0.002) and medial quadriceps (p = 0.02) preactivity followed by increased postactivity in all muscles (p = 0.006), with higher peak vertical ground reaction forces (p = 0.04) but no differences in times to these peaks (p = 0.60) than drop landings. The later gastrocnemius activation, higher gastrocnemius and quadriceps postlanding amplitudes, and higher ground reaction forces in drop jumps may allow subjects to propel the body vertically after the initial landing vs. simply absorbing impact in drop landings. Our results indicate that in addition to landing surface and height, anticipation of a subsequent task changes landing neuromechanics. Generalizations of results from landing-only studies should not be made with landing followed-by-subsequent-activity studies. Landing exercises should be incorporated based on sport-specific demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21873898     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31820f50b6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

Review 1.  Exploring the Justifications for Selecting a Drop Landing Task to Assess Injury Biomechanics: A Narrative Review and Analysis of Landings Performed by Female Netball Players.

Authors:  Tyler J Collings; Adam D Gorman; Max C Stuelcken; Daniel B Mellifont; Mark G L Sayers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effects of two types of trunk exercises on balance and athletic performance in youth soccer players.

Authors:  Atsushi Imai; Koji Kaneoka; Yu Okubo; Hitoshi Shiraki
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-02

Review 3.  What is normal? Female lower limb kinematic profiles during athletic tasks used to examine anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aaron S Fox; Jason Bonacci; Scott G McLean; Michael Spittle; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Impact differences in ground reaction force and center of mass between the first and second landing phases of a drop vertical jump and their implications for injury risk assessment.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Bates; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Timing differences in the generation of ground reaction forces between the initial and secondary landing phases of the drop vertical jump.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Bates; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Kinetic and kinematic differences between first and second landings of a drop vertical jump task: implications for injury risk assessments.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Bates; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  The effects of vertical trunk supportability improvement on one-leg rebound jump efficiency.

Authors:  Kinoshita Kazuaki; Kazunari Ishida; Masashi Hashimoto; Hidetoshi Nakao; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Nao Shibanuma; Masahiro Kurosaka; Shingo Otsuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase.

Authors:  Tomoya Ishida; Yuta Koshino; Masanori Yamanaka; Ryo Ueno; Shohei Taniguchi; Mina Samukawa; Hiroshi Saito; Hisashi Matsumoto; Yoshimitsu Aoki; Harukazu Tohyama
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.