Literature DB >> 21873851

The utility of the "bull's-eye" artifact on breast elasticity imaging in reducing breast lesion biopsy rate.

Richard G Barr1, Amanda E Lackey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the accuracy of the "bull's-eye" artifact of elasticity imaging (EI) in determining the benignity of cystic breast lesions and to determine the utility of such artifact in reducing the biopsy rate of the benign lesions.
METHODS: This study was performed under local institutional review board supervision and was in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. A retrospective review of 383 breast lesions from 309 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic breast ultrasonography with EI (Siemens Antares or Siemens S2000; Siemens Healthcare, Mountain View, Calif) was conducted. The B-mode characteristics of those lesions determined whether biopsy was conducted. Pathological reports of the biopsied lesions were reviewed. Lesions demonstrating the bull's-eye artifact on EI were determined. The accuracy of the artifact in determining the benignity of cystic breast lesions was determined.
RESULTS: Of the 383 lesions, 243 lesions were recommended for biopsy based on the B-mode characteristics (biopsy rate, 63.4%). Of those 243 lesions, 62 lesions demonstrated the bull's-eye artifact on EI, and all were confirmed benign cysts on pathological reports. Of the 181 lesions without the artifact, 116 were benign noncystic lesions, and 65 were malignant noncystic lesions. Hence, within the biopsied lesions, the bull's-eye artifact had perfect sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value in determining pathologically proven benign cysts. If the artifact can be used as a criterion to exclude lesions from biopsy, then the biopsy rate will be 181 (47.3%) of 383, significantly lower than the 63.4% biopsy rate without using this criteria (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The bull's-eye artifact seen on EI on Siemens ultrasonography equipment is a promising tool in the evaluation and characterization of benign breast cysts and has the potential to significantly reduce the amount of unnecessary breast biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21873851     DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31822a9c75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Q        ISSN: 0894-8771            Impact factor:   1.657


  6 in total

1.  Breast elastography: A literature review.

Authors:  A Goddi; M Bonardi; S Alessi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2012-06-30

Review 2.  Strain Elastography - How To Do It?

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Richard G Barr; André Farrokh; Manjiri Dighe; Michael Hocke; Christian Jenssen; Yi Dong; Adrian Saftoiu; Roald Flesland Havre
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-12-07

3.  Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Local and regional staging of invasive breast cancer with sonography: 25 years of practice at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Authors:  Bruno D Fornage
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-12-05

Review 5.  Ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Kang-Ning Li; Ai-Jiao Yi; Bin Wang; Qi Wei; Ge-Ge Wu; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.275

6.  Ultrasound real-time elastography can predict malignancy in BI-RADS®-US 3 lesions.

Authors:  Sebastian Wojcinski; Esther Boehme; André Farrokh; Philipp Soergel; Friedrich Degenhardt; Peter Hillemanns
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.