Literature DB >> 21872886

Colectomy performance improvement within NSQIP 2005-2008.

Deepak K Ozhathil1, YouFu Li, Jillian K Smith, Elan Witkowski, Elizaveta Ragulin Coyne, Karim Alavi, Jennifer F Tseng, Shimul A Shah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All open and laparoscopic colectomies submitted to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) were evaluated for trends and improvements in operative outcomes.
METHODS: 48,247 adults (≥18 y old) underwent colectomy in ACS NSQIP, as grouped by surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open), urgency (emergent versus elective), and operative year (2005 to 2008). Primary outcomes measured morbidity, mortality, perioperative, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: The proportion of laparoscopic colectomies performed increased annually (26.3% to 34.0%), while open colectomies decreased (73.7% to 66.0%; P < 0.0001). Most emergent colectomies were open procedures (93.5%) representing 24.3% of all open cases. The overall risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality for all colectomy procedures did not show a statistically significant change over time, however, morbidity and mortality increased among open colectomies (r = 0.03) and decreased among laparoscopic colectomies (r = -0.04; P < 0.0001). Postoperative complications reduced significantly including superficial surgical site infections (9.17% to 8.20%, P < 0.004), pneumonia (4.60% to 3.97%, P < 0.0001), and sepsis (4.72%, 2005; 6.81%, 2006; 5.62%, 2007; 5.09%, 2008; P < 0.0002). Perioperative improvements included operative time (169.2 to 160.0 min), PRBC transfusions (0.27 to 0.25 units) and length of stay (10.5 to 6.61 d; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: It appears that laparoscopic colectomies are growing in popularity over open colectomies, but the need for emergent open procedures remains unchanged. Across all colectomies, however, key postoperative and perioperative complications have improved over time. Participation in ACS NSQIP demonstrates quality improvement and may encourage greater enrollment.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21872886     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  9 in total

1.  Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: an analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy.

Authors:  Rachelle N Damle; Christopher W Macomber; Julie M Flahive; Jennifer S Davids; W Brian Sweeney; Paul R Sturrock; Justin A Maykel; Heena P Santry; Karim Alavi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Working with existing databases.

Authors:  Melissa Murphy; Karim Alavi; Justin Maykel
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

3.  Barriers to laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: a national analysis.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; Molly M Ford; M Benjamin Hopkins; Roberta L Muldoon; Jonathan P Wanderer; Alexander A Parikh; Timothy M Geiger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Cost Consequences of Age and Comorbidity in Accelerated Postoperative Discharge After Colectomy.

Authors:  Ana C De Roo; Sarah P Shubeck; Anne H Cain-Nielsen; Edward C Norton; Scott E Regenbogen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.412

6.  Type 2 diabetes and postoperative pneumonia: An observational, population-based study using the Spanish Hospital Discharge Database, 2001-2015.

Authors:  Ana López-de-Andrés; Napoleon Perez-Farinos; Javier de Miguel-Díez; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo; Manuel Méndez-Bailón; José M de Miguel-Yanes; Rodrigo Jiménez-García
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  FACTORS RELATED TO THE REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF COMPLICATIONS IN COLORECTAL SURGERY WITHIN PERIOPERATIVE CARE RECOMMENDED BY THE ACERTO PROTOCOL.

Authors:  Alberto Bicudo-Salomão; Rosana de Freitas Salomão; Mariani Parra Cuerva; Michelle Santos Martins; Diana Borges Dock-Nascimento; José Eduardo de Aguilar-Nascimento
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2019-12-20

Review 8.  Clinical review: Can we predict which patients are at risk of complications following surgery?

Authors:  Nirav Shah; Mark Hamilton
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Trends and Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer between 2004 and 2012- an Analysis using National Inpatient Database.

Authors:  Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Chia-Chun Wang; Chia-Na Chang; Shih-Hao Lee; Matthew Lee; Tzu-Chun Hsu; Chien-Chang Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.