Literature DB >> 21871978

Postoperative long-term evaluation of interposition reconstruction compared with Roux-en-Y after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer: prospective randomized controlled trial.

Sumiya Ishigami1, Shoji Natsugoe, Shuichi Hokita, Teruaki Aoki, Hideyuki Kashiwagi, Kosei Hirakawa, Tetsuji Sawada, Yoshitaka Yamamura, Seiji Itoh, Koichi Hirata, Keiichiro Ohta, Kenichi Mafune, Yasushi Nakane, Tatsuo Kanda, Hiroshi Furukawa, Iwao Sasaki, Tetsuro Kubota, Masaki Kitajima, Takashi Aikou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The postoperative clinical superiority of the interposition of jejunum reconstruction (INT) to Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY) after total gastrectomy has not been clarified. Postoperative quality of life (QOL) was evaluated between the 2 methods by a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial.
METHODS: A total of 103 patients with gastric cancer were prospectively randomly divided into groups for RY (n = 51) or INT reconstruction (n = 52) after total gastrectomy. They were stratified by sex, age, institute, histology, and degree of lymph node dissection. Postoperatively, body mass index (BMI) and nutritional conditions were measured serially, and QOL and postoperative squalor scores were evaluated at 3, 12, and 60 months and compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: After removing patients who did not complete the follow-up survey or censured cases, 24 patients in the RY group and 18 patients in the INT group were clinically available and their postoperative status was assessed. QOL scores were increased and complication scores were improved in the postoperative periods (P < .01). Postoperative BMI significantly deteriorated compared with preoperative BMI in each group. The postoperative QOL and complication scores at 60 months after surgery were significantly better than those at 3 months after surgery in each group (P < .01). However, there was no significant difference of QOL scores and postoperative complication scores between the 2 reconstruction groups. The nutritional condition in the INT group was nearly the same as that in the RY group.
CONCLUSIONS: Although our patient sample was small and patients who did not complete the follow-up survey were present, we could not identify any clinical difference between INT and RY after total gastrectomy 60 months after surgery. The safer and simpler RY method may be a more suitable reconstruction method than INT after total gastrectomy.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21871978     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  10 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes for jejunal interposition reconstruction compared with Roux-en-Y anastomosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Xi Fan; Zhong-Fa Xu; Mei-Rong Wang; Dao-Tang Li; Xiang-Shan Yang; Jing Guo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Novel method for esophagojejunal anastomosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: semi-end-to-end anastomosis.

Authors:  Yong-Liang Zhao; Chong-Yu Su; Teng-Fei Li; Feng Qian; Hua-Xing Luo; Pei-Wu Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Systematic review of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues associated with gastric cancer: capturing cross-cultural differences.

Authors:  Alison Rowsell; Samantha C Sodergren; Vassilios Vassiliou; Anne-Sophie Darlington; Marianne G Guren; Bilal Alkhaffaf; Chantelle Moorbey; Kristopher Dennis; Mitsumi Terada
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 7.701

4.  Using of Ileucecal Interposition as a Neo-stomach in Dogs with Total Gastrectomy (Presentation of a Novel Technique).

Authors:  Ehsan Soltani; Ahmad Reza Mohamadnia; Faezeh Alipour; Monavar Afzal Aghaei; Samaneh Ghasemi; Ali Sadrizadeh
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 5.  Preservation versus non-preservation of the duodenal passage following total gastrectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yu-Shang Yang; Long-Qi Chen; Xian-Xia Yan; Ya-Li Liu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Comparative evaluation of two reconstructive methods following laparoscopic assisted subtotal gastrectomy in dogs.

Authors:  Jalal Bakhtiari; Mahbobeh Abdi; Alireza R Khalaj; Farzad Asadi; Amir Niasari-Naslaji
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-12-11

7.  The investigation of diet recovery after distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Tae-Han Kim; Young-Joon Lee; Kyungsoo Bae; Ji-Ho Park; Soon-Chan Hong; Eun-Jung Jung; Young-Tae Ju; Chi-Young Jeong; Tae-Jin Park; Miyeong Park; Ji Eun Kim; Sang-Ho Jeong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  A safe anastomotic technique of using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) in Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for proximal malignant tumors of the stomach.

Authors:  Jian-Wei Xie; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Lu Jun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Construction of a jejunal pouch after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Alexandre Doussot; Baptiste Borraccino; Patrick Rat; Pablo Ortega-Deballon; Olivier Facy
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2014-01

10.  Long-term effects of an oral elemental nutritional supplement on post-gastrectomy body weight loss in gastric cancer patients (KSES002).

Authors:  Yutaka Kimura; Kazuhiro Nishikawa; Kentaro Kishi; Kentaro Inoue; Jin Matsuyama; Yusuke Akamaru; Shigeyuki Tamura; Junji Kawada; Tomono Kawase; Ryohei Kawabata; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Hitoshi Kanno; Takeshi Yamada; Toshio Shimokawa; Hiroshi Imamura
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2019-10-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.