Literature DB >> 21871704

Comparison of scanning acoustic microscopy and histology images in characterizing surface irregularities among engineered human oral mucosal tissues.

Frank Winterroth1, Kyle W Hollman, Shiuhyang Kuo, Kenji Izumi, Stephen E Feinberg, Scott J Hollister, J Brian Fowlkes.   

Abstract

Acoustic microscopy was used to monitor an ex vivo produced oral mucosal equivalent (EVPOME) developed on acellular cadaveric dermis (AlloDerm®). As seeded cells adhered and grew, they filled in and smoothed out the surface irregularities, followed by the production of a keratinized protective outermost layer. If noninvasive in vitro ultrasonic monitoring of these cellular changes could be developed, then tissue cultivation could be adjusted in-process to account for biologic variations in the development of these stratified cell layers. Cultured keratinocytes (from freshly obtained oral mucosa) were harvested and seeded onto AlloDerm® coated with human type IV collagen and cultured 11 days. EVPOMEs were imaged on the 11th day post-seeding using a scanning acoustic microscope (SAM) that consists of a single-element transducer: 61 MHz center frequency, 32 MHz bandwidth, 1.52 f-number. The specimen surface was determined by thresholding the magnitude of the signal at the first axial incidence of a value safely above noise: 20-40 dB above the signal for the water and 2-dimensional (2-D) ultrasonic images were created using confocal image reconstruction. A known area from each micrograph was divided into 12-40 even segments and examined for surface irregularities. These irregularities were quantified and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression analysis were performed to correlate the surface profiles for both the AlloDerm® and EVPOME specimens imaged by SAM. Histology micrographs of the AlloDerm® and EVPOME specimens were also prepared and examined for surface irregularities. Unseeded AlloDerm® averaged seven to nine surface changes per 400 μm. The number of changes in surface irregularities decreased to two to three per 400 μm on the mature EVPOMEs. The numbers of surface irregularities between the unseeded AlloDerm® vs. developing EVPOME are similar for both histology and SAM 2-D B-scan images. For the EVPOME 2-D B-scan micrographs produced by SAM, the decrease in surface irregularities is indicative of the stratified epithelium formed by seeded oral keratinocytes; verified in the histology images between the AlloDerm® and EVPOME. A near 1:1 linear correlation shows the similarities between the two imaging modalities. SAM demonstrates its ability to discern the cell development and differentiation occurring on the EVPOME devices. Unlike histology, SAM measurements are noninvasive and can be used to monitor tissue graft development without damaging any cells/tissues.
Copyright © 2011 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21871704      PMCID: PMC3176963          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  24 in total

1.  Strain imaging of corneal tissue with an ultrasound elasticity microscope.

Authors:  Kyle W Hollman; Stanislav Y Emelianov; Jason H Neiss; Gagik Jotyan; Gregory J R Spooner; Tibor Juhasz; Ron M Kurtz; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Non-linear stress-strain measurements of ex vivo produced oral mucosal equivalent (EVPOME) compared to normal oral mucosal and skin tissue.

Authors:  Frank Winterroth; Scott J Hollister; Stephen E Feinberg; Shiuhyang Kuo; J Brian Fowlkes; Arindam Ganguly; Kyle W Hollman
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

3.  Ultrasonic characterization of whole cells and isolated nuclei.

Authors:  Linda R Taggart; Ralph E Baddour; Anoja Giles; Gregory J Czarnota; Michael C Kolios
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 4.  Ultrasonography in dermatology.

Authors:  Dorothee Dill-Müller; Jan Maschke
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.584

5.  Comparison of integrated backscatter values obtained with acoustic densitometry with values derived from spectral analysis of digitized signals from a clinical imaging system.

Authors:  M R Holland; C S Hall; S H Lewis; S M Handley; A E Finch-Johnston; A P D'Sa; J E Perez; J G Miller
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Ultrasonic biomicroscopy of viable, dead and apoptotic cells.

Authors:  G J Czarnota; M C Kolios; H Vaziri; S Benchimol; F P Ottensmeyer; M D Sherar; J W Hunt
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Flow cytometric quantification of human epidermal cells expressing keratin 16 in vivo after standardized trauma.

Authors:  S de Mare; P E van Erp; F C Ramaekers; P C van de Kerkhof
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.017

8.  Myocardial tissue characterization in heart failure by real-time integrated backscatter.

Authors:  M Zuber; K Gerber; P Erne
Journal:  Eur J Ultrasound       Date:  1999-05

9.  Clinical and histopathological analysis of healing process of intraoral reconstruction with ex vivo produced oral mucosa equivalent.

Authors:  Takeshi Hotta; Satoshi Yokoo; Hiroto Terashi; Takahide Komori
Journal:  Kobe J Med Sci       Date:  2007

10.  NVP-AUY922: a novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor active against xenograft tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis.

Authors:  Suzanne A Eccles; Andy Massey; Florence I Raynaud; Swee Y Sharp; Gary Box; Melanie Valenti; Lisa Patterson; Alexis de Haven Brandon; Sharon Gowan; Frances Boxall; Wynne Aherne; Martin Rowlands; Angela Hayes; Vanessa Martins; Frederique Urban; Kathy Boxall; Chrisostomos Prodromou; Laurence Pearl; Karen James; Thomas P Matthews; Kwai-Ming Cheung; Andrew Kalusa; Keith Jones; Edward McDonald; Xavier Barril; Paul A Brough; Julie E Cansfield; Brian Dymock; Martin J Drysdale; Harry Finch; Rob Howes; Roderick E Hubbard; Alan Surgenor; Paul Webb; Mike Wood; Lisa Wright; Paul Workman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  5 in total

1.  Characterizing morphology and nonlinear elastic properties of normal and thermally stressed engineered oral mucosal tissues using scanning acoustic microscopy.

Authors:  Frank Winterroth; Kyle W Hollman; Shiuhyang Kuo; Arindam Ganguly; Stephen E Feinberg; J Brian Fowlkes; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 2.  Non-invasive and Non-destructive Characterization of Tissue Engineered Constructs Using Ultrasound Imaging Technologies: A Review.

Authors:  Kang Kim; William R Wagner
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Imaging strategies for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Seung Yun Nam; Laura M Ricles; Laura J Suggs; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  High-frequency ultrasonic imaging of growth and development in manufactured engineered oral mucosal tissue surfaces.

Authors:  Frank Winterroth; Hiroko Kato; Shiuhyang Kuo; Stephen E Feinberg; Scott J Hollister; J Brian Fowlkes; Kyle W Hollman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Quantitative Ultrasound for Nondestructive Characterization of Engineered Tissues and Biomaterials.

Authors:  Diane Dalecki; Karla P Mercado; Denise C Hocking
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.934

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.