Literature DB >> 21871605

Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control.

Annika F L Larsson1.   

Abstract

Automation, in terms of systems such as adaptive/active cruise control (ACC) or collision warning systems, is increasingly becoming a part of everyday driving. These systems are not perfect though, and the driver has to be prepared to reclaim control in situations very similar to those the system easily handles by itself. This paper uses a questionnaire answered by 130 ACC users to discuss future research needs in the area of driver assistance systems. Results show that the longer drivers use their systems, the more aware of its limitations they become. Moreover, the drivers report that ACC forces them to take control intermittently. According to theory, this might actually be better than a more perfect system, as it provides preparation for unexpected situations requiring the driver to reclaim control.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21871605     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  2 in total

1.  Automation Expectation Mismatch: Incorrect Prediction Despite Eyes on Threat and Hands on Wheel.

Authors:  Trent W Victor; Emma Tivesten; Pär Gustavsson; Joel Johansson; Fredrik Sangberg; Mikael Ljung Aust
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Component-Based Interactive Framework for Intelligent Transportation Cyber-Physical Systems.

Authors:  Sangsoo Jeong; Youngmi Baek; Sang H Son
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.