BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastroparesis can be diabetic or idiopathic, yet little is known about differences in their presentation. We compared clinical characteristics, symptoms, and gastric emptying in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetic (DG) or idiopathic (IG) gastroparesis. METHODS: We analyzed data from 416 patients with gastroparesis who were enrolled in the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Registry; 254 had IG (most were female and white), and 137 had DG (78 had type 1 and 59 had type 2). Registry data included detailed histories, physical examinations, results from gastric emptying scintigraphy, and responses to validated symptom questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) were an average of 13 years older at the onset of symptoms of gastroparesis and heavier than patients with IG. Patients with type 1 DM had more hospitalizations in the past year than patients with IG. Symptoms that prompted evaluation more often included vomiting for DG and abdominal pain for IG. Patients with DG had more severe retching and vomiting than those with IG, whereas patients with IG had more severe early satiety and postprandial fullness subscores. Compared with IG, gastric retention was greater in patients with type 1 DM. More than 50% of patients with type 1 DM had severe retention (>35% at 4 hours); they took prokinetic agents more frequently and were more likely to receive gastric electric stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: There are similarities and differences in clinical characteristics of DG and IG. Gastroparesis is a heterogeneous disorder; its etiology affects symptoms and severity. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether the differences in symptoms and gastric emptying affect progression and treatment responses.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Gastroparesis can be diabetic or idiopathic, yet little is known about differences in their presentation. We compared clinical characteristics, symptoms, and gastric emptying in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetic (DG) or idiopathic (IG) gastroparesis. METHODS: We analyzed data from 416 patients with gastroparesis who were enrolled in the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Registry; 254 had IG (most were female and white), and 137 had DG (78 had type 1 and 59 had type 2). Registry data included detailed histories, physical examinations, results from gastric emptying scintigraphy, and responses to validated symptom questionnaires. RESULTS:Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) were an average of 13 years older at the onset of symptoms of gastroparesis and heavier than patients with IG. Patients with type 1 DM had more hospitalizations in the past year than patients with IG. Symptoms that prompted evaluation more often included vomiting for DG and abdominal pain for IG. Patients with DG had more severe retching and vomiting than those with IG, whereas patients with IG had more severe early satiety and postprandial fullness subscores. Compared with IG, gastric retention was greater in patients with type 1 DM. More than 50% of patients with type 1 DM had severe retention (>35% at 4 hours); they took prokinetic agents more frequently and were more likely to receive gastric electric stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: There are similarities and differences in clinical characteristics of DG and IG. Gastroparesis is a heterogeneous disorder; its etiology affects symptoms and severity. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether the differences in symptoms and gastric emptying affect progression and treatment responses.
Authors: G Tougas; E Y Eaker; T L Abell; H Abrahamsson; M Boivin; J Chen; M P Hocking; E M Quigley; K L Koch; A Z Tokayer; V Stanghellini; Y Chen; J D Huizinga; J Rydén; I Bourgeois; R W McCallum Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Madhusudan Grover; Gianrico Farrugia; Matthew S Lurken; Cheryl E Bernard; Maria Simonetta Faussone-Pellegrini; Thomas C Smyrk; Henry P Parkman; Thomas L Abell; William J Snape; William L Hasler; Aynur Ünalp-Arida; Linda Nguyen; Kenneth L Koch; Jorges Calles; Linda Lee; James Tonascia; Frank A Hamilton; Pankaj J Pasricha Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: D A Revicki; A M Rentz; D Dubois; P Kahrilas; V Stanghellini; N J Talley; J Tack Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Thomas Abell; Richard McCallum; Michael Hocking; Kenneth Koch; Hasse Abrahamsson; Isabelle Leblanc; Greger Lindberg; Jan Konturek; Thomas Nowak; Eammon M M Quigley; Gervais Tougas; Warren Starkebaum Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: V Stanghellini; C Tosetti; A Paternico; G Barbara; A M Morselli-Labate; N Monetti; M Marengo; R Corinaldesi Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Pankaj J Pasricha; Katherine P Yates; Linda Nguyen; John Clarke; Thomas L Abell; Gianrico Farrugia; William L Hasler; Kenneth L Koch; William J Snape; Richard W McCallum; Irene Sarosiek; James Tonascia; Laura A Miriel; Linda Lee; Frank Hamilton; Henry P Parkman Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: H P Parkman; E K Hallinan; W L Hasler; G Farrugia; K L Koch; J Calles; W J Snape; T L Abell; I Sarosiek; R W McCallum; L Nguyen; P J Pasricha; J Clarke; L Miriel; L Lee; J Tonascia; F Hamilton Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Linda Nguyen; Laura A Wilson; Laura Miriel; Pankaj J Pasricha; Braden Kuo; William L Hasler; Richard W McCallum; Irene Sarosiek; Kenneth L Koch; William J Snape; Gianrico Farrugia; Madhusudan Grover; John Clarke; Henry P Parkman; James Tonascia; Frank Hamilton; Thomas L Abell Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Henry P Parkman; Katherine Yates; William L Hasler; Linda Nguyen; Pankaj J Pasricha; William J Snape; Gianrico Farrugia; Kenneth L Koch; Jorge Calles; Thomas L Abell; Irene Sarosiek; Richard W McCallum; Linda Lee; Aynur Unalp-Arida; James Tonascia; Frank Hamilton Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2013-03-02 Impact factor: 3.199