Literature DB >> 21871040

Improving health care outcomes through personalized comparisons of treatment effectiveness based on electronic health records.

Sharona Hoffman1, Andy Podgurski.   

Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is one of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's significant initiatives that aims to improve treatment outcomes and lower health care costs. This article takes CER a step further and suggests a novel clinical application for it. The article proposes the development of a national framework to enable physicians to rapidly perform, through a computerized service, medically sound personalized comparisons of the effectiveness of possible treatments for patients' conditions. A treatment comparison for a given patient would be based on data from electronic health records of a cohort of clinically similar patients who received the treatments previously and whose outcomes were recorded. This framework has unique potential to simultaneously improve the quality of health care, reduce its cost, and alleviate public concerns about rationing and "one size fits all" medicine.
© 2011 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21871040     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00612.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  2 in total

1.  IDENTIFICATION OF QUESTIONABLE EXCLUSION CRITERIA IN MENTAL DISORDER CLINICAL TRIALS USING A MEDICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA.

Authors:  Handong Ma; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2016

2.  Perceived impacts of health care reform on large urban health departments.

Authors:  Jonathon P Leider; Brian C Castrucci; Pamela Russo; Shelley Hearne
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.