Literature DB >> 21870249

Effects of bracing on human kinematics in low-speed frontal sled tests.

Stephanie M Beeman1, Andrew R Kemper, Michael L Madigan, Stefan M Duma.   

Abstract

Continued development of computational models and biofidelic anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) necessitates further analysis of the effects of bracing on an occupant's biomechanical response in automobile collisions. A total of 20 dynamic sled tests were performed, 10 low (2.5 g, Δv = 4.8 kph) and 10 medium severity (5.0 g, Δv = 9.7 kph), with five male human volunteers of approximately 50th percentile male height and weight. Each volunteer was exposed to two impulses at each severity, one relaxed and one braced prior to the impulse. A Vicon motion analysis system, 12 MX-T20 2 megapixel cameras, was used to quantify subject 3D kinematics (±1 mm) (1 kHz). Excursions of select anatomical regions were normalized to their respective initial positions and compared by test condition. At the low severity, bracing significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the forward excursion of the knees, hips, elbows, shoulders, and head (average 35-70%). At the medium severity, bracing significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the forward excursion of the elbows, shoulders, and head (average 36-69%). Although not significant, bracing at the medium severity considerably reduced the forward excursion of the knees and hips (average 18-26%). This study illustrates that bracing has a significant influence on the biomechanical response of human occupants in frontal sled tests and provides novel biomechanical data that can be used to refine and validate computational models and ATDs used to assess injury risk in automotive collisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21870249     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0379-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  5 in total

1.  Neck Muscle and Head/Neck Kinematic Responses While Bracing Against the Steering Wheel During Front and Rear Impacts.

Authors:  Jason B Fice; Daniel W H Mang; Jóna M Ólafsdóttir; Karin Brolin; Peter A Cripton; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Gunter P Siegmund
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  A Novel Approach to Measuring Muscle Mechanics in Vehicle Collision Conditions.

Authors:  Simon Krašna; Srđan Đorđević; Marija Hribernik; Ana Trajkovski
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Tripping Elicits Earlier and Larger Deviations in Linear Head Acceleration Compared to Slipping.

Authors:  Sara L Arena; Julian L Davis; J Wallace Grant; Michael L Madigan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Occupant safety effectiveness of proactive safety seat in autonomous emergency braking.

Authors:  Myeongkwan Kang; Hyungjoo Kim; Youngkuen Cho; Seonglae Kim; Dohyung Lim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Estimating the Effects of Awareness on Neck-Muscle Loading in Frontal Impacts with EMG and MC Sensors.

Authors:  Simon Krašna; Srđan Đorđević
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.