| Literature DB >> 21869923 |
Mohamed Neifar1, Atef Jaouani, Amel Kamoun, Raoudha Ellouze-Ghorbel, Semia Ellouze-Chaabouni.
Abstract
The decolorization of direct Solophenyl red 3BL (SR), a polyazo dye extensively used in textile industry was studied. The Fomes fomentarius laccase alone did not decolorize SR. The natural redox mediator, acetosyringone (AS), was necessary for decolorization to occur. Box-Behnken design was used to evaluate the effects of three parameters, namely, enzyme concentration (0.5-2.5 U mL(-1)), redox mediator concentration (3-30 μM), and incubation time (1-24 h), on the SR decolorization yield. The fitted mathematical model allowed us to plot response surfaces as well as isoresponse curves and to determine optimal decolorization conditions. The results clearly indicated that the AS concentration was the main factor influencing the SR decolorization yield. The selected optimal conditions were enzyme concentration 0.8 U mL(-1), mediator concentration 33 μM, and time 14 h 30 min. These conditions allowed 79.66% of SR decolorization versus 80.70% for the predicted value. These results showed a promising future of applying laccase-AS system for industrial wastewater bioremediation.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21869923 PMCID: PMC3159015 DOI: 10.4061/2011/179050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Enzyme Res ISSN: 2090-0414
Figure 1Chemical structures of (a) the polyazo dye Solophenyl red 3BL (C.I. Direct 80) and (b) the natural redox mediator acetosyringone.
Experimental domain of the Box-Behnken design.
| Variable | Factor | Unit | Center | Step of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Enzyme conc. | U/mL | 1.5 | 1.0 |
|
| Mediator conc. |
| 16.5 | 13.5 |
|
| Time | h | 12.5 | 11.5 |
Experimental conditions of the Box-Behnken design in coded and natural variables and the corresponding experimental and theoretical responses.
| Run N° |
|
|
| Enzyme | Mediator | Time | Measured decolorization | Estimated decolorization | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (U/mL) | ( | (h) | (%) | (%) | |||||
| 1 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 0.00 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 12.5 | 18.36 | 21.79 | |
| 2 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 0.00 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 12.5 | 26.42 | 25.16 | |
| 3 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.5 | 30.0 | 12.5 | 76.17 | 77.43 | |
| 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2.5 | 30.0 | 12.5 | 66.15 | 62.72 | |
| 5 | −1.00 | 0.00 | −1.00 | 0.5 | 16.5 | 1.0 | 36.72 | 36.28 | |
| 6 | 1.00 | 0.00 | −1.00 | 2.5 | 16.5 | 1.0 | 31.52 | 35.78 | |
| 7 | −1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.5 | 16.5 | 24.0 | 60.87 | 56.62 | |
| 8 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.5 | 16.5 | 24.0 | 45.34 | 45.78 | |
| 9 | 0.00 | −1.00 | −1.00 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 12.47 | 9.48 | |
| 10 | 0.00 | 1.00 | −1.00 | 1.5 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 54.59 | 53.77 | |
| 11 | 0.00 | −1.00 | 1.00 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 24.0 | 21.51 | 22.33 | |
| 12 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.5 | 30.0 | 24.0 | 68.25 | 71.24 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Center points | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.5 | 16.5 | 12.5 | 60.44 | 55.75 |
| 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.5 | 16.5 | 12.5 | 55.71 | 55.75 | |
| 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.5 | 16.5 | 12.5 | 51.59 | 55.75 | |
| 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.5 | 16.5 | 12.5 | 53.68 | 55.75 | |
| 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.5 | 16.5 | 12.5 | 57.32 | 55.75 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Check points | 18 | −0.40 | −0.25 | −0.17 | 1.1 | 13.1 | 10.5 | 51.59 | 48.12 |
| 19 | 0.40 | −0.25 | −0.17 | 1.9 | 13.1 | 10.5 | 49.82 | 47.12 | |
| 20 | 0.00 | 0.45 | −0.17 | 1.5 | 22.6 | 10.5 | 65.24 | 63.22 | |
| 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.17 | 1.5 | 16.5 | 10.5 | 51.65 | 54.17 | |
Analysis of variance.
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Degrees of freedom | Mean square | Ratio | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 5652,89 | 9 | 628,099 | 34.1739 | *** |
| Residuals | 128,657 | 7 | 18,3795 | ||
| Validity | 82,6035 | 3 | 27,5345 | 2.3915 | N.S. |
| Error | 46,0531 | 4 | 11,5132 | ||
|
| |||||
| Total | 5781,55 | 16 | |||
***Significant at the level 99.9% N.S.: nonsignificant.
Validation of the model with the check points.
| Run N° |
|
|
|
| Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 51.590 | 48.122 | 3.468 | 0.741 | N.S. |
| 19 | 49.820 | 47.108 | 2.712 | 0.579 | N.S. |
| 20 | 65.240 | 63.216 | 2.024 | 0.432 | N.S. |
| 21 | 51.650 | 54.174 | −2.524 | −0.538 | N.S. |
y : measured response value; : estimated response value; d: difference between measured and estimated response values; t exp.: student experimental value; N.S.: non significant.
Figure 2Three-dimensional response surface and contour plots for the effect of enzyme and redox mediator concentrations at constant incubation time (12.5 h) on the decolorization of SR.
Figure 4Three-dimensional response surface and contour plots for the effect of enzyme concentration and incubation time at constant redox mediator concentration (16.5 μM) on the decolorization of SR.
Figure 3Three-dimensional response surface and contour plots for the effect of redox mediator concentration and incubation time at constant enzyme concentration (1.5 U/mL) on the decolorization of SR.
Figure 5Three-dimensional response surface and contour plots for the effect of enzyme and redox mediator concentrations at constant incubation time (14.5 h) on the decolorization of SR.