Literature DB >> 21869618

Safe transport of critically ill adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support to a regional extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center.

Jeffrey Javidfar1, Daniel Brodie, Hiroo Takayama, Linda Mongero, Joseph Zwischenberger, Joshua Sonett, Matthew Bacchetta.   

Abstract

Patients with severe cardiac or pulmonary failure who require transport to specialized hospitals currently pose a challenge. Mechanical support in the form of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may increase the safety of transporting such patients to an institution where they will have access to advanced medical therapy. Over 2.5 years, 17 patients were successfully cannulated and placed on a simplified ECMO circuit at other institutions and transported via ambulance to our hospital. Fourteen patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were placed on venovenous (VV) ECMO. Two patients with isolated cardiogenic shock and one patient with ARDS were placed on venoarterial (VA) ECMO. The two cardiogenic shock patients were converted to a biventricular assist device shortly after arrival. The median unit-to-unit transport time was 60 minutes (interquartile range 50-92 minutes), and the median distance traveled was 23 miles (interquartile range 17-55 miles). There was no transport-related morbidity or mortality. The median duration of ECMO support was 8 days (interquartile range 4-11 days). Thirteen patients (76%) were successfully decannulated. Ten patients (59%) were weaned from the ventilator, and nine patients (53%) survived up to 3 months and were discharged from the hospital. Critically ill patients with severe ARDS or cardiogenic shock can be safely transported on VV or VA ECMO support to regional ECMO centers. As the indications and demands for ECMO support expand, so will the role for transporting patients on ECMO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21869618     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182238b55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Interhospital transport of patients with ARDS].

Authors:  N Jahn; M T Voelker; S Bercker; U Kaisers; S Laudi
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Long-distance air transfer on commercial long-haul flights for patients on extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Audrey Maillot; Frederic Bussienne; Eric Braunberger; Bruno Bouchet; Olivier Martinet; Frederic Nativel; Xavier Combes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Remote cannulation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation transport is safe in a newly established program.

Authors:  David S Grenda; Vanessa Moll; Craig M Kalin; James M Blum
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

4.  Inter-hospital transports on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in different health-care systems.

Authors:  Lars Mikael Broman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Contemporary mechanical circulatory support therapy for postcardiotomy shock.

Authors:  Shinichi Fukuhara; Koji Takeda; Arthur Reshad Garan; Paul Kurlansky; Jonathan Hastie; Yoshifumi Naka; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

6.  Effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation transport on short- and long-term survival in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Desiree A Steimer; Omar Hernandez; Gerald Ogola; David P Mason; Gary S Schwartz
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-10-25

7.  Acute mechanical circulatory support for fulminant myocarditis complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Kanika P Mody; Hiroo Takayama; Elissa Landes; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; Ulrich P Jorde; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  The Stockholm experience: interhospital transports on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  L Mikael Broman; Bernhard Holzgraefe; Kenneth Palmér; Björn Frenckner
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Veno-venous ECMO: a synopsis of nine key potential challenges, considerations, and controversies.

Authors:  David B Tulman; Stanislaw P A Stawicki; Bryan A Whitson; Saarik C Gupta; Ravi S Tripathi; Michael S Firstenberg; Don Hayes; Xuzhong Xu; Thomas J Papadimos
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Rapid Development and Implementation of an ECMO Program.

Authors:  Vanessa Moll; Elrond Y L Teo; David S Grenda; Cindy D Powell; Michael J Connor; Bryce T Gartland; Mary J Zellinger; H Bruce Bray; Christopher A Paciullo; Craig M Kalin; Jean M Wheeler; Duc Q Nguyen; James M Blum
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.