Literature DB >> 21869522

A novel framework to classify marginal land for sustainable biomass feedstock production.

Gayathri Gopalakrishnan1, M Cristina Negri, Seth W Snyder.   

Abstract

To achieve food and energy security, sustainable bioenergy has become an important goal for many countries. The use of marginal lands to produce energy crops is one strategy for achieving this goal, but what is marginal land? Current definitions generally focus on a single criterion, primarily agroeconomic profitability. Herein, we present a framework that incorporates multiple criteria including profitability of current land use, soil health indicators (erosion, flooding, drainage, or high slopes), and environmental degradation resulting from contamination of surface water or groundwater resources. We tested this framework for classifying marginal land in the state of Nebraska and estimated the potential for using marginal land to produce biofuel crops. Our results indicate that approximately 1.6 million ha, or 4 million acres, of land (approximately 8% of total land area) could be classified as marginal on the basis of at least two criteria. Second-generation lignocellulosic bioenergy crops such as switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.), miscanthus (Miscanthus giganteus), native prairie grasses, and short-rotation woody crops could be grown on this land in redesigned landscapes that meet energy and environmental needs, without significant impacts on food or feed production. Calculating tradeoffs between the economics of redesigned landscapes and current practices at the field scale is the next step for determining functional designs for integrating biofuel feedstock production into current land management practices. by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21869522     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  7 in total

1.  Prospects for dedicated energy crop production and attitudes towards agricultural straw use: The case of livestock farmers.

Authors:  P Wilson; N J Glithero; S J Ramsden
Journal:  Energy Policy       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.142

2.  Recent Land Use Change to Agriculture in the U.S. Lake States: Impacts on Cellulosic Biomass Potential and Natural Lands.

Authors:  David J Mladenoff; Ritvik Sahajpal; Christopher P Johnson; David E Rothstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genotypic variation in transpiration of coppiced poplar during the third rotation of a short-rotation bio-energy culture.

Authors:  Alejandra Navarro; Miguel Portillo-Estrada; Nicola Arriga; Stefan P P Vanbeveren; Reinhart Ceulemans
Journal:  Glob Change Biol Bioenergy       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.745

4.  One-time nitrogen fertilization shifts switchgrass soil microbiomes within a context of larger spatial and temporal variation.

Authors:  Huaihai Chen; Zamin K Yang; Dan Yip; Reese H Morris; Steven J Lebreux; Melissa A Cregger; Dawn M Klingeman; Dafeng Hui; Robert L Hettich; Steven W Wilhelm; Gangsheng Wang; Frank E Löffler; Christopher W Schadt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Transcriptional, metabolic, physiological and developmental responses of switchgrass to phosphorus limitation.

Authors:  Na Ding; Raul Huertas; Ivone Torres-Jerez; Wei Liu; Bonnie Watson; Wolf-Rüdiger Scheible; Michael Udvardi
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 7.228

6.  Pest-suppression potential of midwestern landscapes under contrasting bioenergy scenarios.

Authors:  Timothy D Meehan; Ben P Werling; Douglas A Landis; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Integrating transcriptional, metabolomic, and physiological responses to drought stress and recovery in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.).

Authors:  Eli Meyer; Michael J Aspinwall; David B Lowry; Juan Diego Palacio-Mejía; Tierney L Logan; Philip A Fay; Thomas E Juenger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.