Literature DB >> 21868897

On dimensionality, sample size, classification error, and complexity of classification algorithm in pattern recognition.

S Raudys1, V Pikelis.   

Abstract

This paper compares four classification algorithms-discriminant functions when classifying individuals into two multivariate populations. The discriminant functions (DF's) compared are derived according to the Bayes rule for normal populations and differ in assumptions on the covariance matrices' structure. Analytical formulas for the expected probability of misclassification EPN are derived and show that the classification error EPN depends on the structure of a classification algorithm, asymptotic probability of misclassification P¿, and the ratio of learning sample size N to dimensionality p:N/p for all linear DF's discussed and N2/p for quadratic DF's. The tables for learning quantity H = EPN/P¿ depending on parameters P¿, N, and p for four classifilcation algorithms analyzed are presented and may be used for estimating the necessary learning sample size, detennining the optimal number of features, and choosing the type of the classification algorithm in the case of a limited learning sample size.

Year:  1980        PMID: 21868897     DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1980.4767011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell        ISSN: 0098-5589            Impact factor:   6.226


  9 in total

1.  Classification of breast tissue by electrical impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  J E da Silva; J P de Sá; J Jossinet
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Gait recognition: highly unique dynamic plantar pressure patterns among 104 individuals.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Tingting Mu; Kerstin Bosch; Dieter Rosenbaum; John Y Goulermas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Classification based hypothesis testing in neuroscience: Below-chance level classification rates and overlooked statistical properties of linear parametric classifiers.

Authors:  Hamidreza Jamalabadi; Sarah Alizadeh; Monika Schönauer; Christian Leibold; Steffen Gais
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Biomarkers identify the Binswanger type of vascular cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Erik Barry Erhardt; John C Pesko; Jillian Prestopnik; Jeffrey Thompson; Arvind Caprihan; Gary A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine-learning methods.

Authors:  Jochen Kruppa; Andreas Ziegler; Inke R König
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  On Kolmogorov Asymptotics of Estimators of the Misclassification Error Rate in Linear Discriminant Analysis.

Authors:  Amin Zollanvari; Marc G Genton
Journal:  Sankhya Ser A       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 7.  Methods Used in Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammograms: A Review.

Authors:  Saleem Z Ramadan
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  A Computational Approach to Identification of Candidate Biomarkers in High-Dimensional Molecular Data.

Authors:  Justin Gerolami; Justin Jong Mun Wong; Ricky Zhang; Tong Chen; Tashifa Imtiaz; Miranda Smith; Tamara Jamaspishvili; Madhuri Koti; Janice Irene Glasgow; Parvin Mousavi; Neil Renwick; Kathrin Tyryshkin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18

9.  A Bayesian Scene-Prior-Based Deep Network Model for Face Verification.

Authors:  Huafeng Wang; Wenfeng Song; Wanquan Liu; Ning Song; Yuehai Wang; Haixia Pan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.