Literature DB >> 21868175

Negative reinforcement smoking outcome expectancies are associated with affective response to acute nicotine administration and abstinence.

Jason D Robinson1, Cho Y Lam, Brian L Carter, David W Wetter, Paul M Cinciripini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Negative affect is an important predictor of smoking behavior, and many smokers believe that smoking reduces negative affect. However, it is unclear whether such beliefs, known as negative reinforcement smoking outcome expectancies (NRSOE), are associated with changes in negative affect in response to nicotine deprivation and administration.
METHODS: Smokers (N=114) participated in 4 sessions that balanced overnight smoking deprivation (12-h deprived vs. ad lib) and nasal spray administration (nicotine vs. placebo). Corrugator supercilii (COR) EMG, skin conductance (SCR), and in-session ratings were collected while the participants viewed affective, cigarette-related, and neutral slides. Retrospective questionnaire data were collected prior to slide viewing. NRSOE were determined using the Smoking Consequences Questionnaire - Adult Nicotine Affect Reduction scale (SCQ-NAR).
RESULTS: High scores on the SCQ-NAR were associated with smaller COR EMG to unpleasant slides following nicotine nasal spray administration compared to placebo spray, regardless of overnight deprivation. Smokers who had high scores on the SCQ-NAR had smaller SCR, following nicotine nasal spray administration compared to placebo spray, but only after overnight deprivation. The in-session ratings and retrospective questionnaire measures indicated that smokers who had high scores on the SCQ-NAR experienced greater negative affect and craving, and less positive affect, than smokers with low scores on the SCQ-NAR, regardless of nicotine exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our questionnaire results suggest that while smokers who have high NRSOE self-report greater overall levels of negative affect and craving, while the psychophysiological data suggest that such smokers may experience negative affect reduction when blindly administered a dose of nicotine.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21868175      PMCID: PMC3242897          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  21 in total

1.  First lapses to smoking: within-subjects analysis of real-time reports.

Authors:  S Shiffman; J A Paty; M Gnys; J A Kassel; M Hickcox
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1996-04

2.  Guidelines for human electromyographic research.

Authors:  A J Fridlund; J T Cacioppo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions.

Authors:  P J Lang; M K Greenwald; M M Bradley; A O Hamm
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Smoking outcome expectancies: factor structure, predictive validity, and discriminant validity.

Authors:  D W Wetter; S S Smith; S L Kenford; D E Jorenby; M C Fiore; R D Hurt; K P Offord; T B Baker
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1994-11

5.  Arteriovenous differences in plasma concentration of nicotine and catecholamines and related cardiovascular effects after smoking, nicotine nasal spray, and intravenous nicotine.

Authors:  S G Gourlay; N L Benowitz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; J B Williams; K Kroenke; M Linzer; F V deGruy; S R Hahn; D Brody; J G Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Predicting smoking cessation. Who will quit with and without the nicotine patch.

Authors:  S L Kenford; M C Fiore; D E Jorenby; S S Smith; D Wetter; T B Baker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09

Review 9.  Addressing tobacco among individuals with a mental illness or an addiction.

Authors:  Jill M Williams; Douglas Ziedonis
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Psychophysiological responses as indices of affective dimensions.

Authors:  C V Witvliet; S R Vrana
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  4 in total

1.  Gender, Ethnicity, and Their Intersectionality in the Prediction of Smoking Outcome Expectancies in Regular Cigarette Smokers.

Authors:  Claudia G Aguirre; Mariel S Bello; Nafeesa Andrabi; Raina D Pang; Peter S Hendricks; Ricky N Bluthenthal; Adam M Leventhal
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2015-10-05

2.  Smokers' Treatment Expectancies Predict Smoking Cessation Success.

Authors:  Lisa M Fucito; Benjamin A Toll; Corey R Roos; Andrea C King
Journal:  J Smok Cessat       Date:  2014-08-27

3.  Depression and anxiety symptoms moderate the relation between negative reinforcement smoking outcome expectancies and nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Raina D Pang; Rubin Khoddam; Casey R Guillot; Adam M Leventhal
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  An Idiographic Examination of Day-to-Day Patterns of Substance Use Craving, Negative Affect and Tobacco Use among Young Adults in Recovery.

Authors:  Yao Zheng; Richard P Wiebe; H Harrington Cleveland; Peter C M Molenaar; Kitty S Harris
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.