Literature DB >> 21867465

Cell recovery comparison between plasma depletion/reduction- and red cell reduction-processing of umbilical cord blood.

Robert Chow1, Allen Lin, Richard Tonai, Rafael Bolanos, Char Connor, Adrienne Mendoza, Rachelle Heminger, Michelle Chow, Eric Ho, Judy Kang, Laura Gindy, Chen Fu, Andrew Rao, Jeffrey F Gau, Brian C Wang, Izabela Klich, Janina Ratajczak, Mariusz Ratajczak, Lawrence D Petz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: Limited cell dose has hampered the use of cord blood transplantation (CBT) in adults. One method of minimizing nucleated cell loss in cord blood (CB) processing is to deplete or reduce plasma but not red blood cells - plasma depletion/reduction (PDR).
METHODS: The nucleated cell loss of PDR was studied, and determined to be less than 0.1% in the discarded supernatant plasma fraction in validation experiments. After testing and archival sampling, the median nucleated cell recovery for PDR processing was 90%, and median CD34(+) cell recovery 88%. In a CB bank inventory of 12 339 products with both pre- and post-processing total nucleated cells (TNC), PDR processing resulted in median post-processing TNC recoveries of 90.0% after testing and archival samples removal. Using the same 10 CB units divided into two halves, we compared directly the recovery of PDR against hydroxyethyl starch red cell reduction (RCR) for TNC, CD34(+) cells and colony-forming units (CFU-GM, CFU-E, CFU-GEMM and total CFU) after parallel processing. We also compared the loss of very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSEL).
RESULTS: We demonstrated significantly higher recoveries using PDR for TNC (124%), CD34(+) cells (121%), CFU-GM (225%), CFU-GEMM (201%), total CFU (186%) and VSEL (187%). The proportion of high TNC products was compared between 10 912 PDR and 38 819 RCR CB products and found to be 200% higher for products that had TNC ≥150 × 10(7) (P = 0.0001) for the PDR inventory.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that PDR processing of CB provides a significantly more efficient usage of this valuable and scarce resource.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21867465     DOI: 10.3109/14653249.2011.592524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  2 in total

1.  Effect of cord blood processing on transplantation outcomes after single myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation.

Authors:  Karen K Ballen; Brent R Logan; Mary J Laughlin; Wensheng He; Daniel R Ambruso; Susan E Armitage; Rachel L Beddard; Deepika Bhatla; William Y K Hwang; Joseph E Kiss; Gesine Koegler; Joanne Kurtzberg; Arnon Nagler; David Oh; Lawrence D Petz; Thomas H Price; Ralph R Quinones; Voravit Ratanatharathorn; J Douglas Rizzo; Kathleen Sazama; Andromachi Scaradavou; Michael W Schuster; Leonard S Sender; Elizabeth J Shpall; Stephen R Spellman; Millicent Sutton; Lee Ann Weitekamp; John R Wingard; Mary Eapen
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  The role and potential of umbilical cord blood in an era of new therapies: a review.

Authors:  Santiago Roura; Josep-Maria Pujal; Carolina Gálvez-Montón; Antoni Bayes-Genis
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.832

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.