OBJECTIVE: To estimate the time to breakeven and 5-year net costs for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding among obese patients with diabetes taking direct and indirect costs into account. METHODS: Indirect cost savings were generated by quantifying the cross-sectional relationship between medical expenditures and absenteeism and between medical expenditures and presenteeism (reduced on-the-job productivity) and simulating indirect cost savings based on these multipliers and reductions in direct medical costs available in the literature. RESULTS: Time to breakeven was estimated to be nine quarters with and without the inclusion of indirect costs. After 5 years, net savings increase from $26570 (±$9000) to $34160 (±$10 380) when indirect costs are included. CONCLUSION: This study presented a novel approach for incorporating indirect costs into cost-benefit analyses. Application to gastric banding revealed that inclusion of indirect costs improves the financial outlook for the procedure. (C)2011The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the time to breakeven and 5-year net costs for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding among obesepatients with diabetes taking direct and indirect costs into account. METHODS: Indirect cost savings were generated by quantifying the cross-sectional relationship between medical expenditures and absenteeism and between medical expenditures and presenteeism (reduced on-the-job productivity) and simulating indirect cost savings based on these multipliers and reductions in direct medical costs available in the literature. RESULTS: Time to breakeven was estimated to be nine quarters with and without the inclusion of indirect costs. After 5 years, net savings increase from $26570 (±$9000) to $34160 (±$10 380) when indirect costs are included. CONCLUSION: This study presented a novel approach for incorporating indirect costs into cost-benefit analyses. Application to gastric banding revealed that inclusion of indirect costs improves the financial outlook for the procedure. (C)2011The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Authors: Carl Stepnowsky; Kathleen F Sarmiento; Shay Bujanover; Kathleen F Villa; Vicky W Li; Natalia M Flores Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Charles M Yarborough; Stacy Brethauer; Wayne N Burton; Raymond J Fabius; Pamela Hymel; Shanu Kothari; Robert F Kushner; John Magaña Morton; Kathryn Mueller; Nicolaas P Pronk; Mitchell S Roslin; David B Sarwer; Brian Svazas; Jeffrey S Harris; Garrett I Ash; Jamie T Stark; Marianne Dreger; Julie Ording Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Anne F Peery; Evan S Dellon; Jennifer Lund; Seth D Crockett; Christopher E McGowan; William J Bulsiewicz; Lisa M Gangarosa; Michelle T Thiny; Karyn Stizenberg; Douglas R Morgan; Yehuda Ringel; Hannah P Kim; Marco Dacosta DiBonaventura; Charlotte F Carroll; Jeffery K Allen; Suzanne F Cook; Robert S Sandler; Michael D Kappelman; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Iftekhar Kalsekar; Jan-Samuel Wagner; Marco DiBonaventura; Jay Bates; Robert Forbes; Tony Hebden Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Jean-Eric Tarride; Aristithes G Doumouras; Dennis Hong; J Michael Paterson; Semra Tibebu; Richard Perez; Julia Ma; Valerie H Taylor; Feng Xie; Vanessa Boudreau; Eleanor Pullenayegum; David R Urbach; Mehran Anvari Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 14.766