Literature DB >> 2186592

Secondary repair of ulnar nerve injury. 44 cases followed for 2 years.

C Barrios1, S Amillo, J de Pablos, J Cañadell.   

Abstract

A series of 44 patients with complete section of the ulnar nerve was reviewed on average 2 years after secondary repair. The procedures applied were fascicular grafting in 33 cases, epineural suture in 7, and suture in 4. Useful ulnar motor function was restored in 22 cases of fascicular grafting, in all 4 of fascicular suture and in 3 of epineural suture. Sensibility recovered in 23 patients operated on by fascicular grafts and in 10 of 11 treated by epineural or fascicular suture. Cases with unsatisfactory results had other associated severe lesions, i.e., median nerve section, vascular damage or tendon injuries. Early repair of clean-cut nerve sections by fascicular or epineural suture gives a good chance for recovery. Grafting should be performed within 3 months and no later than 1 year after the injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2186592     DOI: 10.3109/17453679008993065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  6 in total

1.  Cold sensitivity and its association to functional disability following a major nerve trunk injury in the upper extremity-A national registry-based study.

Authors:  Drifa Frostadottir; Linnéa Ekman; Malin Zimmerman; Lars B Dahlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  Reconstruction of a long defect of the ulnar artery and nerve with an arterialized neurovenous free flap in a teenager: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Diogo Casal; Diogo Pais; Eduarda Mota-Silva; Giovanni Pelliccia; Inês Iria; Paula A Videira; Maria Manuel Mendes; João Goyri-O'Neill; Maria Manuel Mouzinho
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.425

3.  Outcome following nerve repair of high isolated clean sharp injuries of the ulnar nerve.

Authors:  René Post; Kornelis S de Boer; Martijn J A Malessy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sensory recovery outcome after digital nerve repair in relation to different reconstructive techniques: meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Felix J Paprottka; Petra Wolf; Yves Harder; Yasmin Kern; Philipp M Paprottka; Hans-Günther Machens; Jörn A Lohmeyer
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2013-07-30

5.  Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries.

Authors:  Bo He; Zhaowei Zhu; Qingtang Zhu; Xiang Zhou; Canbin Zheng; Pengliang Li; Shuang Zhu; Xiaolin Liu; Jiakai Zhu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 6.  Evidence-Based Approach to Timing of Nerve Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Brendan J MacKay; Cameron T Cox; Ian L Valerio; Jeffrey A Greenberg; Gregory M Buncke; Peter J Evans; Deana M Mercer; Desirae M McKee; Ivica Ducic
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 1.539

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.