Literature DB >> 21865607

Heterogeneity of cancer patient information-seeking behaviors.

Christel Protière1,2, Nora Moumjid3, Anne-Deborah Bouhnik1,2, Anne Gaëlle Le Corroller Soriano1,2, Jean Paul Moatti1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether cancer patients report different information-seeking behaviors (ISBs), investigate why they searched for information, and determine the relationship between their ISBs and their socioeconomic and behavioral characteristics. The authors also explored the relationship between ISB and participation in the medical decision-making process as well as the patients' health state.
METHODS: A sample of 4270 French cancer survivors aged 18 or older was interviewed at 2 years following diagnosis. Rather than deciding a priori who should be considered an information seeker, the authors chose to statistically define the different ISBs using cluster analysis.
RESULTS: The authors identified 4 distinct profiles: Stereotypical high-information seekers and acquainted seekers are generally highly educated. They search for information due to their own motivation or because they are close to the medical profession. Constrained information seekers are characterized by a low socioeconomic status. They perceive themselves as "dropouts" of the health care system. Finally, the general information seekers did not systematically resort to any specific ISB. The authors show that after adjustment, belonging to a specific ISB was associated with the likelihood of participating in the medical decision-making process and, more surprisingly, with health state.
CONCLUSIONS: A key finding of this study is that social disparities are significantly associated with the different ISBs. If these relationships are found in other samples, it would further support the need for medical teams to pay more attention to patients with lower levels of education, particularly in health care systems that have acknowledged equality as a founding principle. The clusters determined in this study offer a potential theoretical framework that can be used in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21865607     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11415114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  11 in total

1.  Influences of patient sociodemographics on cancer information received through the first 9 months of treatment.

Authors:  Anthony Molisani; Levent Dumenci; Robin K Matsuyama
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Inequalities and Barriers to the Use of Supportive Care Among Young Breast Cancer Survivors: a Qualitative Understanding.

Authors:  Veronique Regnier Denois; Madina Querre; Linjie Chen; Marion Barrault; Franck Chauvin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  eHealth literacy, Internet and eHealth service usage: a survey among cancer patients and their relatives.

Authors:  Nikolaus Halwas; Lena Griebel; Jutta Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Meeting the information needs of lower income cancer survivors: results of a randomized control trial evaluating the american cancer society's "I can cope".

Authors:  Michelle Y Martin; Mary B Evans; Polly Kratt; Lori A Pollack; Judith Lee Smith; Robert Oster; Mark Dignan; Heather Prayor-Patterson; Christopher Watson; Peter Houston; Shiquina Andrews; Amandiy Liwo; Tung Sung Tseng; Sandral Hullett; Joann Oliver; Maria Pisu
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014-01-16

5.  Health information needs and preferences in relation to survivorship care plans of long-term cancer survivors in the American Cancer Society's Study of Cancer Survivors-I.

Authors:  Mary Playdon; Leah M Ferrucci; Ruth McCorkle; Kevin D Stein; Rachel Cannady; Tara Sanft; Brenda Cartmel
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Engaging Patients in Decisions About Cancer Screening: Exploring the Decision Journey Through the Use of a Patient Portal.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Alex H Krist; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Resa M Jones; Rebecca R Lehman; Camille J Hochheimer; Roy T Sabo; Dominick L Frosch; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Daniel R Longo
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  The labour market, psychosocial outcomes and health conditions in cancer survivors: protocol for a nationwide longitudinal survey 2 and 5 years after cancer diagnosis (the VICAN survey).

Authors:  Anne-Deborah Bouhnik; Marc-Karim Bendiane; Sebastien Cortaredona; Luis Sagaon Teyssier; Dominique Rey; Cyril Berenger; Valerie Seror; Patrick Peretti-Watel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Purposeful Agency in Support Seeking During Cancer Treatment From a Person-Centered Perspective.

Authors:  Filipa Ventura; Ingalill Koinberg; Per Karlsson; Richard Sawatzky; Joakim Öhlén
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2016-03-03

9.  Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the "My Personal Breast Screening" (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Alexandra Roux; Rachel Cholerton; Jonathan Sicsic; Nora Moumjid; David P French; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Corinne Balleyguier; Michal Guindy; Fiona J Gilbert; Jean-Benoit Burrion; Xavier Castells; David Ritchie; Debbie Keatley; Camille Baron; Suzette Delaloge; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Associations between reporting of cancer alarm symptoms and socioeconomic and demographic determinants: a population-based, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rikke Pilsgaard Svendsen; Maja Skov Paulsen; Pia Veldt Larsen; Bjarne Lühr Hansen; Henrik Støvring; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.