Literature DB >> 21865453

Fast and slow γ rhythms are intrinsically and independently generated in the subiculum.

Jesse Jackson1, Romain Goutagny, Sylvain Williams.   

Abstract

Gamma rhythms are essential for memory encoding and retrieval. Despite extensive study of these rhythms in the entorhinal cortex, dentate gyrus, CA3, and CA1, almost nothing is known regarding their generation and organization in the structure delivering the most prominent hippocampal output: the subiculum. Here we show using a complete rat hippocampal preparation in vitro that the subiculum intrinsically and independently generates spontaneous slow (25-50 Hz) and fast (100-150 Hz) gamma rhythms during the rising phase and peak of persistent subicular theta rhythms. These two gamma frequencies are phase modulated by theta rhythms without any form of afferent input from the entorhinal cortex or CA1. Subicular principal cells and interneurons phase lock to both fast and slow gamma, and single cells are independently phase modulated by each form of gamma rhythm, enabling selective participation in neural synchrony at both gamma frequencies at different times. Fast GABAergic inhibition is required for the generation of fast gamma, whereas slow gamma is generated by excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms. In addition, the transverse subicular axis exhibits gamma rhythm topography with faster gamma coupling arising in the distal subiculum region. The subiculum therefore possesses a unique intrinsic circuit organization that can autonomously regulate the timing and topography of hippocampal output synchronization. These results suggest the subiculum is a third spontaneous gamma generator in the hippocampal formation (in addition to CA3 and the entorhinal cortex), and these gamma rhythms likely play an active role in mediating the flow of information between the hippocampus and multiple cortical and subcortical brain regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21865453      PMCID: PMC6623234          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1370-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

1.  A θ-γ oscillation code for neuronal coordination during motor behavior.

Authors:  Jun Igarashi; Yoshikazu Isomura; Kensuke Arai; Rie Harukuni; Tomoki Fukai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Fast gamma oscillations are generated intrinsically in CA1 without the involvement of fast-spiking basket cells.

Authors:  Michael T Craig; Chris J McBain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Methodological Considerations on the Use of Different Spectral Decomposition Algorithms to Study Hippocampal Rhythms.

Authors:  Y Zhou; A Sheremet; Y Qin; J P Kennedy; N M DiCola; S N Burke; A P Maurer
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-08-01

4.  Tuning in the Hippocampal Theta Band In Vitro: Methodologies for Recording from the Isolated Rodent Septohippocampal Circuit.

Authors:  Frédéric Manseau; Sylvain Williams
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  Mechanisms of gamma oscillations.

Authors:  György Buzsáki; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Effect of Xylazine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam on the Local Field Potential of the Rat Olfactory Bulb.

Authors:  Peter Olegovich Kosenko; Aleksey Borisovich Smolikov; Viktor Borisovich Voynov; Pavel Dmitrievich Shaposhnikov; Anton Igorevich Saevskiy; Valeriy Nikolaevich Kiroy
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 0.982

7.  Reversal of theta rhythm flow through intact hippocampal circuits.

Authors:  Jesse Jackson; Bénédicte Amilhon; Romain Goutagny; Jean-Bastien Bott; Frédéric Manseau; Christian Kortleven; Steven L Bressler; Sylvain Williams
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Depression biased non-Hebbian spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity in the rat subiculum.

Authors:  Anurag Pandey; Sujit Kumar Sikdar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Low- and high-gamma oscillations deviate in opposite directions from zero-phase synchrony in the limbic corticostriatal loop.

Authors:  Julien Catanese; J Eric Carmichael; Matthijs A A van der Meer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Aesthetic preference recognition of 3D shapes using EEG.

Authors:  Lin Hou Chew; Jason Teo; James Mountstephens
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.