Literature DB >> 21865340

Necker cube: stimulus-related (low-level) and percept-related (high-level) EEG signatures early in occipital cortex.

Jürgen Kornmeier1, Miriam Pfäffle, Michael Bach.   

Abstract

During observation of an ambiguous Necker cube, our percept changes spontaneously although the external stimulus does not. An EEG paradigm allowing time-resolved EEG measurement during endogenous perceptual reversals recently revealed a chain of ERP correlates beginning with an early occipital positivity at around 130 ms (Reversal Positivity, "RP"). In order to better understand the functional role of this RP, we investigated its relation to the P100, which is spatiotemporally close, typically occurring 100 ms after onset of a visual stimulus at occipital electrodes. We compared the relation of the ERP amplitudes to varying sizes of ambiguous Necker cubes. The main results are: (1) The P100 amplitude increases monotonically with stimulus size but is independent of the participants' percept. (2) The RP, in contrast, is percept-related and largely unaffected by stimulus size. (3) A similar pattern to RP was found for reaction times: They depend on the percept but not on stimulus size. We speculate that the P100 reflects processing of elementary visual features, while the RP is related to a processing conflict during 3D interpretation that precedes a reversal. The present results indicate that low-level visual processing (related to stimulus size) and (relative) high-level processing (related to perceptual reversal) occur in close spatial and temporal vicinity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21865340     DOI: 10.1167/11.9.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Ambiguous figures - what happens in the brain when perception changes but not the stimulus.

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Michael Bach
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Distinct MEG correlates of conscious experience, perceptual reversals and stabilization during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kristian Sandberg; Gareth Robert Barnes; Bahador Bahrami; Ryota Kanai; Morten Overgaard; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Visual perception affected by motivation and alertness controlled by a noninvasive brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Vladimir A Maksimenko; Anastasia E Runnova; Maksim O Zhuravlev; Vladimir V Makarov; Vladimir Nedayvozov; Vadim V Grubov; Svetlana V Pchelintceva; Alexander E Hramov; Alexander N Pisarchik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Classifying the Perceptual Interpretations of a Bistable Image Using EEG and Artificial Neural Networks.

Authors:  Alexander E Hramov; Vladimir A Maksimenko; Svetlana V Pchelintseva; Anastasiya E Runnova; Vadim V Grubov; Vyacheslav Yu Musatov; Maksim O Zhuravlev; Alexey A Koronovskii; Alexander N Pisarchik
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Neural Interactions in a Spatially-Distributed Cortical Network During Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Vladimir A Maksimenko; Nikita S Frolov; Alexander E Hramov; Anastasia E Runnova; Vadim V Grubov; Jürgen Kurths; Alexander N Pisarchik
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  What happens in the brain of meditators when perception changes but not the stimulus?

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Evelyn Friedel; Lukas Hecker; Stefan Schmidt; Marc Wittmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sensor-Level Wavelet Analysis Reveals EEG Biomarkers of Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Alexander Kuc; Vadim V Grubov; Vladimir A Maksimenko; Natalia Shusharina; Alexander N Pisarchik; Alexander E Hramov
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Early visual processing relevant to the reduction of adaptation-induced perceptual bias.

Authors:  Tomokazu Urakawa; Motoyoshi Tanaka; Yuta Suzuki; Osamu Araki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.