Literature DB >> 21864559

Exploring the time course of face matching: temporal constraints impair unfamiliar face identification under temporally unconstrained viewing.

Müge Ozbek1, Markus Bindemann.   

Abstract

The identification of unfamiliar faces has been studied extensively with matching tasks, in which observers decide if pairs of photographs depict the same person (identity matches) or different people (mismatches). In experimental studies in this field, performance is usually self-paced under the assumption that this will encourage best-possible accuracy. Here, we examined the temporal characteristics of this task by limiting display times and tracking observers' eye movements. Observers were required to make match/mismatch decisions to pairs of faces shown for 200, 500, 1000, or 2000ms, or for an unlimited duration. Peak accuracy was reached within 2000ms and two fixations to each face. However, intermixing exposure conditions produced a context effect that generally reduced accuracy on identity mismatch trials, even when unlimited viewing of faces was possible. These findings indicate that less than 2s are required for face matching when exposure times are variable, but temporal constraints should be avoided altogether if accuracy is truly paramount. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21864559     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Infrequent identity mismatches are frequently undetected.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison.

Authors:  David White; P Jonathon Phillips; Carina A Hahn; Matthew Hill; Alice J O'Toole
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Face matching in a long task: enforced rest and desk-switching cannot maintain identification accuracy.

Authors:  Hamood M Alenezi; Markus Bindemann; Matthew C Fysh; Robert A Johnston
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Effects of time pressure and time passage on face-matching accuracy.

Authors:  Matthew C Fysh; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Eye Movement Dynamics Differ between Encoding and Recognition of Faces.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Danielle L Noles; Jack W Tsao; Annie W-Y Chan
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-12

6.  Matching Faces Against the Clock.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; Matthew Fysh; Katie Cross; Rebecca Watts
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-10-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.