Literature DB >> 21864366

Pharmacogenomic technologies: a necessary "luxury" for better global public health?

Catherine Olivier1, Bryn Williams-Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenomic technologies aim to redirect drug development to increase safety and efficacy of individual care. There is much hope that their implementation in the drug development process will help respond to population health needs, particularly in developing countries. However, there is also fear that novel pharmacogenomic drugs will remain too costly, be designed for the needs of the wealthy nations, and so constitute an unnecessary "luxury" for most populations. In this paper, we analyse the promise that pharmacogenomic technologies hold for improving global public health and identify strategies and challenges associated with their implementation. DISCUSSION: This paper evaluates the capacity of pharmacogenomic technologies to meet six criteria described by the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics group: 1) impact of the technology, 2) technology appropriateness, 3) capacity to address local burdens, 4) feasibility to be implemented in reasonable time, 5) capacity to reduce the knowledge gap, and 6) capacity for indirect benefits. We argue that the implementation of pharmacogenomic technologies in the drug development process can positively impact population health. However, this positive impact depends on how and for which purposes the technologies are used. We discuss the potential of these technologies to stimulate drug discovery in the case of rare (orphan diseases) or neglected diseases, but also to reduce acute adverse drug reactions in infectious disease treatment and prevention, which promises to improve global public health.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of pharmacogenomic technologies may lead to the development of drugs that appear to be a "luxury" for populations in need of numerous interventions that are known to have a demonstrable impact on population health (e.g., secure access to potable water, reduction of social inequities, health education). However, our analysis shows that pharmacogenomic technologies do have the potential to redirect drug development and distribution so as to improve the health of vulnerable populations. Strategies should thus be developed to better direct their implementation towards meeting the needs and responding to the realities of populations of the developing world (i.e., social, cultural and political acceptability, and local health burdens), making pharmacogenomic technologies a necessary "luxury" for global public health.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21864366      PMCID: PMC3175439          DOI: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Global Health        ISSN: 1744-8603            Impact factor:   4.185


  77 in total

Review 1.  The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2.

Authors:  G A FitzGerald; C Patrono
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Hospitalisations caused by adverse drug reactions (ADR): a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  H J M Beijer; C J de Blaey
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2002-04

Review 3.  Equity and population health: toward a broader bioethics agenda.

Authors:  Norman Daniels
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  BiDil: assessing a race-based pharmaceutical.

Authors:  Howard Brody; Linda M Hunt
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  BiDil for heart failure in black patients.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Alicia Fernandez
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Universal health care, genomic medicine and Thailand: investing in today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Béatrice Séguin; Billie-Jo Hardy; Peter A Singer; Abdallah S Daar
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Being specific about race-specific medicine.

Authors:  Jonathan Kahn; Pamela Sankar
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 8.  Pharmacogenetics/genomics and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Wolfgang Sadée; Zunyan Dai
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Pharmacogenomics, ethics, and public policy.

Authors:  Karen Peterson-Iyer
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2008-03

10.  Reducing out-of-pocket expenditures to reduce poverty: a disaggregated analysis at rural-urban and state level in India.

Authors:  Charu C Garg; Anup K Karan
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.344

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenomics in early-phase clinical development.

Authors:  Tal Burt; Savita Dhillon
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 2.  Unintended effects of orphan product designation for rare neurological diseases.

Authors:  Sinéad M Murphy; Araya Puwanant; Robert C Griggs
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Genomics in research and health care with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Authors:  Rebekah McWhirter; Dianne Nicol; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015 Jun-Sep
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.